ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of Adolescent Asthma Self-Efficacy Questionnaire to Brazilian Portuguese and analysis of its measurement properties.
Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSome scales evaluate the self-efficacy of asthmatic adolescents, but do not consider issues related to age and the correct use of medication. GOAL: To translate to cross-culturally adapt to Portuguese and to test the psychometric properties of the Adolescent Asthma Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (AASEQ).
methodsThe questionnaire was translated and adapted to Portuguese. The final version was applied in two moments with an interval between seven and fourteen days. Asthma-related Quality of Life Questionnaires (PedsQL and PAQLQA) were also applied. Reliability, agreement, construct validity, ceiling and floor effect, and confirmatory factor analysis were evaluated.
resultsA total of 135 adolescents (median age 14 (interquartile range 12‒16) were evaluated, and the severity of asthma was mild in 63 (47 %), with controlled symptoms in 90 (67 %). The internal consistency of the AASEQ was adequate (Cronbach's alpha 0.70). The standard error of measurement was very good (SEM = 5.82 points and MDC90 % = 6.68), with moderate reliability (ICC
conclusionAASEQ is a reliable tool to assess self-efficacy in Brazilian adolescents with asthma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.