ArticleJMIR aging2025
Medicaid Education and Eligibility Planning for Caregivers: Website Usability and Validation Study.
Article in JMIR aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Most older Americans have not saved enough to cover long-term care costs. Medicaid-a public health care program for low-income individuals-can help Americans with qualifying care needs pay for assistance in a nursing home or for services in the home. Determining financial eligibility for Medicaid is complicated, and the application process is often managed by family caregivers with limited knowledge of Medicaid programs. Objective: A one-stop digital solution is needed to help family caregivers plan for the cost of long-term care services and learn about getting help paying for services through Medicaid. We aimed to develop a web application that (1) educates informal caregivers about Medicaid programs and eligibility criteria, (2) informs them about the cost of home and institutional care in their local area with and without Medicaid coverage, and (3) uses a custom algorithm to provide personalized financial eligibility information based on the care recipient's income, assets, and monthly spending. Methods: We first interviewed aging services providers and informal family caregivers, then developed a web application that was refined based on user experience interviews with English- and Spanish-speaking caregivers. In the final validation phase, asynchronous usability sessions were recorded with 109 informal caregivers who completed a series of tasks. Participants viewed and rated animated Medicaid "explainer" videos, input financial information to enable the custom algorithm to determine the care recipient's eligibility for Medicaid, adjusted settings on a care cost calculator to estimate the regional cost of home and institutional care services, and completed a Medicaid knowledge quiz before and after using the website. Results: After engaging with the website and watching the videos, scores on a Medicaid knowledge quiz increased by 61.2% (2-tailed t92=12.9, P<.001). Participants found it easy to enter the care recipient's financial information to determine Medicaid eligibility (out of 7; mean 5.9, SD 1.3) and perceived the care cost calculator as very helpful (out of 7; mean 6.3, SD 1.2). The website received a very high System Usability Scale rating of 88.3 out of 100 (SD 13.1). Caregivers verbalized wanting more education on complex financial concepts that impact Medicaid eligibility and asset preservation. Conclusions: A comprehensive Medicaid planning website can significantly improve caregivers' knowledge of Medicaid and provide them with a personalized roadmap for accessing care services. The custom algorithm powering the Medicaid eligibility determination could be further refined to account for state-based exceptions. This application may reduce caregiver burden and help support the long-term care planning process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.