Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40864891›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Satisfaction With Internet Access, Cancer Information-Seeking, and Digital Health Technology: Cross-Sectional Survey Assessment.

Maria Andrea Rincon, Richard P Moser, Kelly D Blake

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria Andrea Rincon *Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, United States, 1 2400553564.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-9088-9159
Richard P Moser *Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, United States, 1 2400553564.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6884-0653
Kelly D BlakeDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20892, United States, 1 2400553564.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2151-2983

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Access to high-quality internet plays an increasingly important role in supporting care delivery and health information access. Although internet access has the potential to alleviate some inequities in health care, the digital divide negatively impacts cancer across the continuum. While subscription to high-speed internet has been previously assessed, satisfaction with home internet to meet the health needs of users is a lesser-known, important indicator of satisfactory access to internet-based health information and digital health technology use. Objective: This study aimed to assess differences in perceptions of quality of at-home internet connection and its association to cancer health information-seeking experiences and use of digital health technologies in a nationally representative sample of US adults. Methods: Secondary analysis of data from the National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 2022 (n=6252) was conducted. The primary predictor, "how satisfied are you with your Internet connection at home to meet health-related needs?," a novel item on HINTS 6, was dichotomized into "high" (extremely satisfied or very satisfied) and "low" (somewhat satisfied, not very satisfied, or not at all satisfied) satisfaction. Outcomes variables included 3 items assessing cancer information-seeking experiences and 2 items measuring access to telehealth and patient portals over the past 12 months. Adjusted logistic regression models (P<.05) were performed, including age, race and ethnicity, education, income, health insurance access, geography, and difficulty understanding cancer information, a proxy for health literacy, as covariates. Results: Those reporting low satisfaction with their home internet had higher odds of agreeing that searching for cancer information took a lot of effort (odds ratio [OR] 1.59, 95% CI 1.16-2.19) and that they felt frustrated searching for cancer information (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.07-1.98). Respondents with lower satisfaction with their home internet had lower odds of accessing their patient portal at least once in the past year (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33-0.89). While the relationship between internet satisfaction and concern over information quality was not significant, respondents aged 18-34 years reported higher odds to be concerned compared with those aged 75 years and older (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.04-2.90), and those with lower education reported less concern over the quality of information compared with those with postbaccalaureate degrees (high school graduate: OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.31-0.99; college graduate: OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.48-0.95). Finally, while the association between satisfaction with internet and telehealth use over the past 12 months was not significant, those without health insurance were significantly less likely to have had a telehealth appointment in the last year (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19-0.81). Conclusions: Satisfaction with internet at home to meet health needs is correlated with cancer information-seeking experiences and usage of some available health technology. These findings underscore the value of high-quality internet services toward successful implementation of health care technology and better patient experiences in health information seeking.

Indexed as

Digital TechnologyInformation Seeking BehaviorInternetInternet AccessNeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDigital HealthFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionSurveys and Questionnairescancerdigital healthEHRelectronic health recordhealth information-seekingtelehealth

Identifiers

PMID40864891
PMCPMC12384670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.