ArticleCurrent issues in molecular biology2025
Molecular Insights into Tumor Immunogenicity.
Article in Current issues in molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editorial for the Special Issue "Molecular Biology in Drug Design and Precision Therapy".Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tumor immunogenicity depends on the ability of peptides to form stable and specific interactions with both HLA molecules and T-cell receptors (TCRs). While HLA binding is essential, not all HLA-binding peptides elicit T-cell responses. This study investigates the molecular features distinguishing immunogenic T-cell epitopes from non-immunogenic HLA binders. Two datasets of nonamer peptides-38 T-cell epitopes and 144 non-epitopes-were compiled and analyzed using sequence logo models and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of TCR-peptide-HLA complexes. A comparative logo analysis revealed strong amino acid preferences at central positions (p4-p8) in T-cell epitopes and absences in non-epitopes. A representative epitope-non-epitope pair was selected for structural modeling and 100 ns MD simulations. The T-cell epitope formed a more stable complex with the TCR and exhibited greater flexibility, supporting an induced-fit recognition mechanism. It also established a broader and longer-lasting network of hydrogen bonds and π interactions across the residues at positions p4-p8. In contrast, the non-epitope engaged TCR at only two positions. These findings highlight the critical role of the peptide's central region in TCR engagement and provide structural insights useful for neoantigen prediction, vaccine design, and TCR-based immunotherapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.