ReviewCurrent issues in molecular biology2025
Teriparatide for Guided Bone Regeneration in Craniomaxillofacial Defects: A Systematic Review of Preclinical Studies.
Review in Current issues in molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Editorial for Special Issue "Osteoclastogenesis and Osteogenesis: Physiological and Molecular Responses to Xenobiotics and Biomaterials".Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Autologous guided bone regeneration: a comprehensive narrative review.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Periodontal disease and endocrine imbalance: a molecular pathways perspective.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of teriparatide (TP) in guided bone regeneration (GBR). An electronic search without language or date restrictions was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Scielo, and gray literature for articles published until June 2025. Inclusion criteria considered studies evaluating the effect of TP on bone regeneration, analyzed using SYRCLE's Risk of Bias tool. Twenty-four preclinical studies were included, covering diverse craniofacial models (mandibular, calvarial, extraction sockets, sinus augmentation, distraction osteogenesis, segmental defects) and employing systemic or local TP administration. Teriparatide consistently enhanced osteogenesis, graft integration, angiogenesis, and mineralization, with potentiated effects when combined with various biomaterials, including polyethylene glycol (PEG), hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate (HA/TCP), biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP), octacalcium phosphate collagen (OCP/Col), enamel matrix derivatives (EMDs), autografts, allografts, xenografts (Bio-Oss), strontium ranelate, and bioactive glass. Critically, most studies presented a moderate-to-high risk of bias, with insufficient randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding, which limited the internal validity of the findings. TP shows promising osteoanabolic potential in guided bone regeneration, enhancing bone formation, angiogenesis, and scaffold integration across preclinical models. Nonetheless, its translation to clinical practice requires well-designed human randomized controlled trials to define optimal dosing strategies, long-term safety, and its role in oral and craniomaxillofacial surgical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.