Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40864708›Full record

ArticleScience advances2025

Shoreline wave breaking strongly enhances the coastal sea spray aerosol population: Climate and air quality implications.

Shengqian Zhou, Matthew Salter, Timothy Bertram, Eduardo Brito Azevedo, Francisco Reis, Jian Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shengqian ZhouCenter for Aerosol Science and Engineering, Department of Energy, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0846-0127
Matthew SalterDepartment of Environmental Science, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0645-3265
Timothy BertramDepartment of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3026-7588
Eduardo Brito AzevedoInstitute of Agricultural and Environmental Research and Technology (IITAA), University of the Azores, Angra do Heroísmo, Azores, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5172-7742
Francisco ReisEnvironmental Observatory of the Azores, Angra do Heroísmo, Azores, Portugal.ORCID 0009-0003-3917-5959
Jian WangCenter for Aerosol Science and Engineering, Department of Energy, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2815-4170

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sea spray aerosol (SSA) emission is a major source of atmospheric aerosols, influencing global climate and coastal air quality. Much of our knowledge about SSA derives from coastal observations near shorelines, but whether and when these observations accurately represent open oceans remain unclear. Here, we show that strong nearshore SSA production during high-wave periods greatly enhances downwind cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and aerosol mass concentrations. Strong shoreline wave breaking is widespread globally, and swell waves, which are decoupled from local winds, play a dominant role in many coastal regions. Therefore, extrapolating results based on coastal measurements to open oceans may significantly overestimate SSA concentration and its contribution to CCN and, by extension, the impact of SSA on clouds and climate. Additionally, the strong enhancement of coastal aerosol population by shoreline wave breaking and its environmental impact on coastal communities cannot be captured by current regional models, which do not parameterize nearshore SSA generation using wave energy or completely neglect it.

Identifiers

PMID40864708
PMCPMC12383254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.