Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40864631›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

When the hammer drops: Identification of knapping techniques in blade production based on a multi-scale study of knapping traces.

Olivier Touzé, Veerle Rots

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Olivier TouzéTraceoLab, Research Unit AAP, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3690-0161
Veerle RotsTraceoLab, Research Unit AAP, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6404-3160

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As defined by J. Tixier, a knapping technique corresponds to the concrete means used to detach a flake. It involves three essential parameters: the tool(s) used, the mode of force application and the behaviour of the body which includes the knapping gesture. In order to identify the knapping techniques used in prehistory, previous studies have mainly focused on macroscopic features on the blanks, but difficulties have often been encountered, leading to mixed results. We present the results of an experimental study that incorporates the macroscopic and microscopic level to examine and characterize knapping traces and integrates a hierarchical cluster analysis to refine identifications. Microscopic traces prove to be complementary to macroscopic traces and to constitute a key aspect for the identification of prehistoric knapping techniques. By focusing on the mode of force application and the contact tool, we show that each parameter of the knapping technique needs to be identified separately. Based on this principle, we demonstrate that it is possible, on the basis of specific sets of attributes, to identify blades produced by direct and indirect percussion and pressure, as well as to differentiate between the use of harder and softer contact tools, although further characterization of the latter does not seem possible without the identification and analysis of knapping-related residues.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyTool Use BehaviorCluster AnalysisHumans

Identifiers

PMID40864631
PMCPMC12385441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.