Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40864526›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical statistics

Design Considerations for a Phase II Platform Trial in Major Depressive Disorder.

Michaela Maria Freitag, Dario Zocholl, Elias Laurin Meyer, Stefan M Gold, Marta Bofill Roig, Heidi De Smedt, Martin Posch, Franz König, EU‐PEARL MDD Investigators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical statistics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A European platform trial for major depressive disorder.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michaela Maria FreitagInstitute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0009-0924-1277
Dario ZochollInstitute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9218-6919
Elias Laurin MeyerCenter for Medical Data Science, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5398-6334
Stefan M GoldDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5188-4799
Marta Bofill RoigCenter for Medical Data Science, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4400-7541
Heidi De SmedtJohnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Beerse, Belgium.
Martin PoschCenter for Medical Data Science, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8499-8573
Franz KönigCenter for Medical Data Science, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6893-3304
EU‐PEARL MDD InvestigatorsMembership of The EU-PEARL MDD Investigators is Provided in the Acknowledgments.

Funding

EU-PEARL (EU Patient-cEntric clinicAl tRial pLatforms) project has received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) 2 Joint Undertaking (JU) 853966German Research Foundation RA 2347/11-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the leading causes of disability globally. Despite its prevalence, approximately one-third of patients do not benefit sufficiently from available treatments, and few new drugs have been developed recently. Consequently, more efficient methods are needed to evaluate a broader range of treatment options quickly. Platform trials offer a promising solution, as they allow for the assessment of multiple investigational treatments simultaneously by sharing control groups and by reducing both trial activation and patient recruitment times. The objective of this simulation study was to support the design and optimisation of a phase II superiority platform trial for MDD, considering the disease-specific characteristics. In particular, we assessed the efficiency of platform trials compared to traditional two-arm trials by investigating key design elements, including allocation and randomisation strategies, as well as per-treatment arm sample sizes and interim futility analyses. Through extensive simulations, we refined these design components and evaluated their impact on trial performance. The results demonstrated that platform trials not only enhance efficiency but also achieve higher statistical power in evaluating individual treatments compared to conventional trials. The efficiency of platform trials is particularly prominent when interim futility analyses are performed to eliminate treatments that have either no or a negligible treatment effect early. Overall, this work provides valuable insights into the design of platform trials in the superiority setting and underscores their potential to accelerate therapy development in MDD and other therapeutic areas, providing a flexible and powerful alternative to traditional trial designs.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicMajor Depressive DisorderResearch DesignComputer SimulationHumansSample SizeAntidepressive Agentsallocationclinical trial simulationsfutility stoppingmajor depressive disordermultiple treatment armsplatform trial

Identifiers

PMID40864526
PMCPMC12384050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.