Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40864504›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition2025

Making weight makes sense: relative performance gains after rapid weight loss in powerlifting: a randomized controlled trial.

Arkadiusz Matras, Michał Czapla, Artur Struzik

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Arkadiusz MatrasDietetyka #NieNaŻarty, Dietary Counseling Center, Wrocław, Poland.
Michał CzaplaWroclaw Medical University, Division of Scientific Research and Innovation in Emergency Medical Service, Department of Emergency Medical Service, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4245-5420
Artur StruzikWroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, Department of Physiology and Biomechanics, Wroclaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRapid weight loss (RWL) is a common strategy among competitive powerlifters aiming to qualify for lower weight categories and improve competitive advantage. However, the effects of RWL followed by short-term recovery on maximal strength performance remain unclear. This study aimed to examine whether a ~ 5% RWL protocol followed by a 2-hour recovery period affects changes in maximal and relative strength performance in trained male powerlifters.

methodsThis randomized controlled trial (RCT) was registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622000924752). In this RCT study, 26 male powerlifters (24.6 ± 4.5 y; 92.8 ± 13.6 kg) were assigned to a rapid weight loss (RWL;

resultsThe RWL group achieved a mean body mass reduction of 4.81%, with significant decreases in fat mass (-15.7%), fat-free mass (-2.36%), and body water (-2.41%) compared to CON (all

conclusionIn the group that underwent a rapid weight loss of approximately 5%, followed by a short-term recovery period, maximal strength performance was maintained. This indicates that it is possible to reduce body mass without compromising absolute strength levels in competitive powerlifters. At the same time, RWL group achieved higher IPF GL and IPF GL BP values.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceMuscle StrengthWeight LiftingWeight LossAdultCaloric RestrictionDiet, Carbohydrate-RestrictedHumansMaleYoung AdultIPF scoremuscular recoveryRehydrationstrength performanceweight-class sports

Identifiers

PMID40864504
PMCPMC12392435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.