ArticleJMIR medical informatics2025
A Machine Learning Model for Predicting Sarcopenia Among Middle-Aged Adults: Development and External Validation.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A LASSO-based nomogram for predicting sarcopenia-related nutritional risk in esophageal cancer patients: model development, validation, and an interactive clinical decision tool.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Risk prediction of sarcopenia in a large health checkup population: development and validation of a dynamic online nomogram.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSarcopenia is a common muscle disorder in older adults, and its early identification and management in middle-aged populations are essential for ensuring a healthier later life. Detecting sarcopenia at an earlier stage may reduce the future burden on health care systems and enhance the quality of life in older adults. Machine learning (ML) models can evaluate large datasets, identify essential variables, and find complicated correlations between input variables. However, using ML models to detect sarcopenia remains an unsatisfied need.
objectiveThis study aimed to develop and externally validate an ML model to predict sarcopenia risk among middle-aged adults using a nationally representative dataset.
methodsWe analyzed data from 1926 participants aged 40 to 64 years and enrolled in the 2022 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). Sarcopenia was diagnosed and defined based on the 2019 Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia criteria, which incorporate both low muscle mass and reduced muscle strength. Muscle mass was assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis with cutoffs of <7.0 kg/m² for men and <5.7 kg/m² for women. Muscle strength was measured via handgrip strength using a digital dynamometer with thresholds of <28 kg for men and <18 kg for women. Participants meeting both criteria were classified as those with sarcopenia. Four ML algorithms, random forest, support vector machine, extreme gradient boosting, and logistic regression, were used to identify risk factors of sarcopenia and predict its likelihood. The top-performing model was subsequently validated in an external cohort of 2247 middle-aged adults from the 2023 KNHANES. Model performance was assessed using the F
resultsAmong the 4 models, the logistic regression model demonstrated the strongest performance, yielding an area under the curve of 0.85, a sensitivity of 0.92, and an F
conclusionsThis study developed and externally validated an ML model that accurately identified sarcopenia in middle-aged adults. Leveraging data from a comprehensive national survey, our findings underscore the significance of early detection and customized interventions in midlife to mitigate sarcopenia risk and optimize long-term health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.