Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40864466›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

Automated Tobacco Cessation Intervention for Parents in Pediatric Primary Care: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial.

Emara Nabi-Burza, Brian P Jenssen, Abra M Jeffers, Janani Ramachandran, Jeritt G Thayer, Bethany Hipple, Douglas E Levy, Robert W Grundmeier, Olivier Drouin, Mark Vangel and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04974736 (Electronic Pediatric Office Systems to Support Treatment for Parental Tobacco Use), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04974736 nacompletednot on this map

Electronic Pediatric Office Systems to Support Treatment for Parental Tobacco Use

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2021 to 2024Enrolled817ConditionsTobacco Smoking, Second Hand Tobacco Smoke, Smoking CessationArmsiEHR + Navigator
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Emara Nabi-BurzaDivision of General Academic Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston.
Brian P JenssenDepartment of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Abra M JeffersDivision of General Academic Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston.
Janani RamachandranClinical Futures, PolicyLab, and The Possibilities Project, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jeritt G ThayerDepartment of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Bethany HippleDivision of General Academic Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston.
Douglas E LevyTobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Robert W GrundmeierDepartment of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Olivier DrouinDivision of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Mark VangelDepartment of Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Nancy A RigottiTobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Tyra Bryant-StephensDepartment of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Ekaterina NekrasovaClinical Futures, PolicyLab, and The Possibilities Project, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Madeline McKnightUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.
Jonathan P WinickoffDivision of General Academic Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston.
Alexander G FiksDepartment of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Funding

Electronic Pediatric Office Systems to Support Treatment for Parental Tobacco UseR01CA245145 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FIKS, ALEXANDER GABRIEL, WINICKOFF, JONATHAN P · 2020 to 2024
$4.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA245145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Treatment for tobacco use for parents in pediatric primary care settings is rarely provided but may support cessation and reduce childhood tobacco smoke exposure. Objective: To study the integration of the automated Clinical Effort Against Secondhand Smoke Exposure (eCEASE) tobacco cessation intervention into pediatric primary care via the electronic health record (EHR). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cluster-randomized clinical trial was conducted from July 16, 2021, to August 15, 2023, at 12 pediatric primary care practices in the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, region. Participants included parents who used combusted tobacco in the past 7 days and attended a child's preventive health care visit. Intervention: In all practices, household members completed EHR previsit questionnaires about tobacco use. Parents in intervention practices were proactively offered eCEASE (automated delivery of nicotine replacement therapy [NRT], quitline and/or SmokefreeTXT enrollment, and navigator support). Control practice parents received usual care. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was biochemically confirmed 7-day abstinence from combusted tobacco use by parents at the 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included NRT and quitline and/or SmokefreeTXT use and recent quit attempts. Changes in cigarettes per day and smoking frequency (daily or nondaily) from baseline to 1-year follow-up were also examined. Results: Of 817 enrolled smoking parents (672 [82.3%] female), 323 of 408 (79.2%) in the intervention arm (6 practices) and 326 of 409 (79.7%) in the control arm (6 practices) were mothers; mean (SD) age was 36.17 (8.67) years. The follow-up survey was completed by 367 of 408 parents (90.0%) in the intervention arm and 368 of 409 (90.0%) in the control arm. Biochemically confirmed 7-day abstinence rates were 34 of 408 (8.3%) in the intervention arm vs 26 of 409 (6.4%) in the control arm (adjusted odds ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.79-2.29). Among those who completed follow-up, 177 of 367 (48.2%) in the intervention arm vs 59 of 368 (16.0%) in the control arm reported using NRT; 93 of 367 (22.8%) and 8 of 368 (2.2%), respectively, reported using quitline and/or SmokefreeTXT messaging; and 294 of 367 (80.1%) vs 258 of 368 (70.1%), respectively, reported a quit attempt in the last 3 months. Compared with control practices, intervention practices reported a greater reduction in the mean (SD) number of cigarettes smoked daily (-3.32 [5.39] vs -1.81 [5.84]) and a greater reduction in the mean (SD) percentage of daily smokers (-35.2% [2.6%] vs -25.8% [2.6%]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cluster-randomized clinical trial of an automated intervention to treat parental tobacco use in pediatric practices, the intervention did not significantly improve the primary outcome of quit rate at 1 year. Findings in this trial demonstrated increased treatment engagement and reductions in cigarette consumption, but additional strategies are needed to improve quit rates. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04974736.

Indexed as

ParentsSmoking CessationTobacco Smoke PollutionTobacco Use CessationAdultChildElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMalePhiladelphiaPrimary Health CareTobacco Use Cessation DevicesTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID40864466
PMCPMC12391990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.