Trial reportJAMA cardiology2025
Clinical Outcomes With Personalized Accelerated Physiologic Pacing in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Follow-up of the myPACE Trial.
Trial report in JAMA cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04721314 (Personalized Pacing), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Personalized Pacing: A New Paradigm for Patients With Diastolic Dysfunction or Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiac implantable electronic devices in heart failure: needs, challenges, and real-world implementation.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Rethinking heart rate modulation in heart failure: physiological basis, clinical evidence, and individualized targets: a narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Review
- Impact of prior pacemaker implantation on length of stay in acute diastolic heart failure: a propensity score-matched analysis.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and physiologic pacemakers may benefit from pacing rates above the standard 60 beats per minute (bpm). Objective: To compare adverse event accrual between personalized accelerated pacing and usual care in HFpEF. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was an observational extension of the myPACE randomized clinical trial with up to 4 years of follow-up in 100 patients with stage B or C HFpEF and preexisting physiologic pacemakers treated at the University of Vermont Medical Center. The myPACE study was conducted from June 2019 to December 2021; follow-up for this report was concluded in June 2023. Intervention: Participants in the original myPACE trial were randomly assigned to either personalized accelerated pacing (myPACE) or 60 bpm (usual care). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the accrual of first and recurrent adverse clinical events during the open-label follow-up phase-including urgent visits or hospitalizations for heart failure or atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, stroke, or death-assessed using an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and a prespecified per-protocol (PP) analysis of patients who continued their assigned treatment. Secondary outcomes included event-free survival in both ITT and PP analyses. Results: Among the 100 original trial participants (48 in myPACE and 52 in usual care), the ITT analysis demonstrated a trend toward slower event accrual with the myPACE intervention (15 vs 33 events; Lin-Wei-Ying-Yang estimate [LWYY], 0.48; 95% CI, 0.22-1.06; P = .07) and longer event-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; 95% CI, 0.31-1.29; P = .20) but did not reach statistical significance. In the prespecified PP analysis, 87 remained on their assigned heart rate setting over the 4-year follow-up (39 in myPACE and 48 in usual care). The mean (SD) age was 74 (10) years, and 48 participants (55%) were male. In this PP analysis, myPACE was associated with a slower accrual of clinical events (5 vs 31 events; LWYY, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.67; P = .01) and longer event-free survival (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.11-0.80; P = .02) compared to usual care. These results were primarily driven by heart failure-related events. Conclusions and Relevance: In this observational clinical events analysis of the myPACE trial, analysis by ITT did not achieve statistical significance between study arms. However, PP analysis showed that personalized accelerated physiologic pacing was associated with a slower accrual of adverse clinical events compared with the standard 60-bpm setting. These results are hypothesis generating and warrant confirmation in larger multicenter trials. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04721314.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.