ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2025
E-TBI: explainable outcome prediction after traumatic brain injury using machine learning.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Creation and validation of a mortality risk prediction model for ICU patients with traumatic brain injury: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the most prevalent health conditions, with severity assessment serving as an initial step for management, prognosis, and targeted therapy. Existing studies on automated outcome prediction using machine learning (ML) often overlook the importance of TBI features in decision-making and the challenges posed by limited and imbalanced training data. Furthermore, many attempts have focused on quantitatively evaluating ML algorithms without explaining the decisions, making the outcomes difficult to interpret and apply for less-experienced doctors. This study presents a novel supportive tool, named E-TBI (explainable outcome prediction after TBI), designed with a user-friendly web-based interface to assist doctors in outcome prediction after TBI using machine learning. The tool is developed with the capability to visualize rules applied in the decision-making process. At the tool's core is a feature selection and classification module that receives multimodal data from TBI patients (demographic data, clinical data, laboratory test results, and CT findings). It then infers one of four TBI severity levels. This research investigates various machine learning models and feature selection techniques, ultimately identifying the optimal combination of gradient boosting machine and random forest for the task, which we refer to as GBMRF. This method enabled us to identify a small set of essential features, reducing patient testing costs by 35%, while achieving the highest accuracy rates of 88.82% and 89.78% on two datasets (a public TBI dataset and our self-collected dataset, TBI_MH103). Classification modules are available at https://github.com/auverngo110/Traumatic_Brain_Injury_103 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
40864421What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.