ReviewProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2026
Complementary Use of Probiotics and Their Antimicrobial Proteins in Brucellosis: A Comprehensive Review of Mechanisms and Clinical Benefits.
Review in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Case Report: Neurological brucellosis with behavioral abnormalities: a case of Brucella encephalitis with mild cognitive impairment.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brucellosis, a chronic intracellular infection caused by Brucella spp., remains therapeutically challenging due to antimicrobial resistance and frequent relapse. Probiotic microorganisms produce antimicrobial proteins-including bacteriocins and thermostable peptides-that inhibit pathogen viability, modulate host immunity, and attenuate oxidative damage. In murine models, therapeutic administration of Lactobacillus-based probiotics reduced Brucella infection index by 58.75%, while prophylactic use yielded a 25% reduction. Co-treatment with rifampicin eliminated residual infection, outperforming antibiotics alone. Experimental and clinical data suggest probiotics enhance antioxidant markers-e.g., lower malondialdehyde and higher total glutathione-while modulating cytokine profiles toward Th1-skewed immunity, with increased IFN-γ and regulated IL-10. Pediatric trials report faster symptom resolution and improved oxidative balance under probiotic co-administration. Additionally, mucosal vaccines vectored by probiotic strains elicit strong IgA/IgG titers and T-cell responses, targeting Brucella antigens such as Omp16, Omp31, and SOD. Given the limitations of current antibiotic regimens and rising antimicrobial resistance, probiotic-based approaches could offer a promising adjunctive strategy. Despite preclinical promise, no phase III trials exist evaluating probiotic-antibiotic synergy in human brucellosis. Future directions include standardized strain selection, mechanistic optimization, and multicenter randomized trials to enable clinical translation of probiotic-protein therapeutics in brucellosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40864417What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.