Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40864410›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2026

Designing a SPIKES-based protocol for communicating uncertainty in indeterminate thyroid cytology: a mixed-method analysis within a pilot study.

Rossella Melcarne, Fabrizio Consorti, Giorgio Grani, Tal Deborah Engel, Eva Iannuzzi, Carla Ammendolia, Laura Giacomelli, Cosimo Durante, Marco Biffoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rossella Melcarne *Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico, 155, 00161, Rome, Italy. rossella.melcarne@uniroma1.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2820-7607
Fabrizio Consorti *Department of General Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico, 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Giorgio GraniDepartment of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico, 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Tal Deborah EngelDepartment of General and Specialist Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico, 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Eva IannuzziDepartment of General and Specialist Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico, 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Carla AmmendoliaDepartment of General and Specialist Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico, 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Laura GiacomelliDepartment of General and Specialist Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico, 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Cosimo DuranteDepartment of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico, 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Marco BiffoniDepartment of General and Specialist Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico, 155, 00161, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indeterminate thyroid cytology presents a significant diagnostic challenge, often leading to difficult treatment decisions for both physicians and patients. Effective communication of these uncertainties is crucial, especially in a surgical setting, where decisions can have long-lasting impacts. This is particularly important for younger surgeons who may lack extensive clinical experience. This study aimed to plan, develop, implement, and pilot a communication protocol designed for surgeons, particularly those in training, to navigate uncertainty and build trust with their patients. Additionally, it documented the reactions of patients managed using this approach. Fifty-two patients diagnosed with indeterminate thyroid cytology were enrolled between March 2023 and January 2024 at the Endocrine Surgery Unit of "Azienda Ospedialiera Universitaria Policlinico Umberto I" in Rome, Italy. A communication protocol based on the SPIKES model (Setting, Perception, Invitation, Knowledge, Emotion, Strategy), a six-step protocol for guiding  difficult conversations, was designed to structure discussions around uncertain diagnoses. Patient consultations were conducted in three phases: the initial outpatient visit, pre-surgery admission, and a follow-up one week after surgery. During each encounter, patients' emotional responses were recorded using open-ended questions. To ensure clarity, a Decision Aid (DA) tool was introduced during the K-Knowledge phase of SPIKES, to better explain the risks and treatment options. A mixed-methods approach was used to analyze both qualitative and quantitative data from patient feedback. The adapted protocol was found to be effective in enhancing patient comprehension and emotional response. Approximately 80% of patients reported emotional relief after the first consultation, and by the third encounter, 91% expressed a sense of well-being or trust. The most frequently reported emotional states across all three encounters were serenity, reassurance, and trust. A small subset of patients continued to experience concern or fatigue. Additionally, 96% of participants rated the communication as clear, and 88.5% considered the final therapeutic decision as the correct one. This pilot study suggests that a structured SPIKES-based communication protocol can help address gaps in patient understanding, trust, and satisfaction when managing indeterminate thyroid cytology. Implementing such protocols may streamline communication in surgical settings, improve  patient-centered care, and support physicians, particularly trainees, in managing complex patient interactions.

Indexed as

CommunicationPhysician-Patient RelationsThyroid GlandThyroid NeoplasmsThyroid NoduleAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsUncertaintyPatient-centered careRiskShared decision makingSoft skillsSurgery residencyThyroid nodules

Identifiers

PMID40864410
PMCPMC12909332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.