ArticleCellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2025
Effect of neoadjuvant targeted therapy on the tumor microenvironment in resectable lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical research advances in thoracic surgery and thoracic oncology in 2025: a panoramic narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Charting the blueprint: a bibliometric analysis reveals future strategies in lung cancer targeted therapy (2003-2025).Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeoadjuvant targeted therapy has emerged as a promising strategy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The analysis of the immune status of tumor microenvironment (TME) after targeted therapies is crucial for understanding the impact of targeted therapy on the TME and providing a basis for synergistic therapeutic approaches.
methodsForty-two patients with resectable lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) were enrolled in this study, and multiplex immunofluorescence technology was used to explore the immune status of the TME after neoadjuvant targeted therapies.
resultsAmong the 42 patients, 9 (21.4%) and 33 (78.6%) had ALK and EGFR mutations, respectively, and TKIs were their first-line treatment. All patients received R0 resection, and thoracoscopic minimally invasive surgery were the predominant method. Seven (16.7%) patients reached pathological complete response (pCR), 4 (9.5%) get major pathological response (MPR), and these 11 patients were classified into the MPR group. The remaining 31 (73.8%) patients were non-MPR. The densities of CD8 + T cells (P < 0.001, P = 0.001), GZMB + CD8 + T cells (P = 0.004, P = 0.008), PD-1 + CD8 + T cells (P = 0.019, P = 0.036), macrophages (P = 0.020, P = 0.007), M1 macrophages (P = 0.010, P = 0.007), and ratios of CD8 + T/Treg (P < 0.001, P = 0.026) in TME were significantly higher in the MPR group and ALK mutation group compared with non-MPR and EGFR group. There were positive correlations between CD8 + T cells, PD-1 + CD8 + T cells (r = 0.397, P = 0.009) and GZMB + CD8 + T cells (r = 0.351, P = 0.023); CD8 + T cells and macrophages (r = 0.343, P = 0.026), and M1 macrophages (r = 0.412, P = 0.007). Additionally, eleven patients experienced disease progress during the follow-up period, and the Log-Rank test revealed that MPR patients tended to get longer PFS compared with non-MPR patients (P = 0.063), especially patients with higher densities of macrophages in the TME had significantly longer PFS (P = 0.042).
conclusionTKI-targeted therapy could reduce tumor burden, facilitating complete surgical resection. Patients with MPR and ALK mutations had a higher density of inflammatory immune cells in the TME and those with higher densities of macrophage had significantly longer PFS. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.