ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2025
Fetal echocardiography in an Arab population: indications and findings from a tertiary care center.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the indications and common findings of fetal echocardiography at a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia, as well as identify factors associated with abnormal findings. We conducted a retrospective analysis of fetal echocardiograms performed over five years at a high-volume referral center. Indications were categorized as maternal factors (e.g., diabetes, family history of CHD) or fetal factors (e.g., abnormal ultrasound, extracardiac anomalies). These factors were also evaluated using null hypothesis significance testing to assess their association with abnormal outcomes. Among 968 referrals, fetal indications (38%),was the most common reason for echocardiography referral, followed by maternal conditions (25%). These indications were also associated with abnormal echocardiography findings (p < 0.001). Of the abnormal findings, the most prevalent CHD subtypes were complex anomalies (24.3%) and ventricular septal defects (16.1%). In this study population, being indicated for fetal anomalies predicted abnormal echocardiography findings, supporting their prioritization in referral guidelines. Maternal factors had a less pronounced value, suggesting opportunities to refine screening criteria. These findings highlight the need for region-specific protocols to improve CHD detection in Arab populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.