ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2025
Discovering dispersion: How robust is automated model discovery for human myocardial tissue?
Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Constitutive discovery in the living human heart.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computational modeling has become an integral tool for understanding the interaction between structural organization and functional behavior in a wide range of biological tissues, including the human myocardium. Traditional constitutive models, and recent models generated by automated model discovery, are often based on the simplifying assumption of perfectly aligned fiber families. However, experimental evidence suggests that many fiber-reinforced tissues exhibit local dispersion, which can significantly influence their mechanical behavior. Here, we integrate the generalized structure tensor approach into automated material model discovery to represent fibers that are distributed with rotational symmetry around three mean orthogonal directions-fiber, sheet, and normal-by using probabilistic descriptions of the orientation. Using biaxial extension and triaxial shear data from human myocardium, we systematically vary the degree of directional dispersion and stress measurement noise to explore the robustness of the discovered models. Our findings reveal that up to a moderate dispersion in the fiber direction and arbitrary dispersion in the sheet and normal directions improve the goodness of fit and enable recovery of a previously proposed four-term model in terms of the isotropic second invariant, two dispersed anisotropic invariants, and one coupling invariant. Our approach demonstrates strong robustness and consistently identifies similar model terms, even in the presence of up to 7% random noise in the stress data. In summary, our study suggests that automated model discovery based on the powerful generalized structure tensors is robust to noise and captures microstructural uncertainty and heterogeneity in a physiologically meaningful way.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.