Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40864370›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2025

Barriers and attitudes toward cervical cancer screening among eligible women.

Carolina Terra de Moraes Luizaga, Alice Barros Câmara, Lise Cristina Pereira Baltar Cury, Rossana Veronica Mendoza Lopez, Carlos Alberto Huaira Contreras, Partha Basu, Victor Wünsch-Filho, Andre Lopes Carvalho

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carolina Terra de Moraes LuizagaDepartment of Epidemiology, Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. carolinaterra@usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0985-2245
Alice Barros CâmaraDepartment of Epidemiology, Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1974-4363
Lise Cristina Pereira Baltar CuryFundação Oncocentro de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rossana Veronica Mendoza LopezCenter for Translational Oncology Research, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7993-767X
Carlos Alberto Huaira ContrerasUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1681-7261
Partha BasuEarly Detection, Prevention, and Infections Branch, International Agency for Research On Cancer, Lyon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0124-4050
Victor Wünsch-FilhoDepartment of Epidemiology, Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5958-1717
Andre Lopes CarvalhoEarly Detection, Prevention, and Infections Branch, International Agency for Research On Cancer, Lyon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7214-6402

Funding

São Paulo Research Foundation - FAPESP 2021/11794-4World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study examined barriers and attitudes toward cervical cancer screening among eligible women in São Paulo, Brazil, and their associations with sociodemographic factors, screening behaviors, and knowledge.

methodsA survey was conducted with 384 women aged 25-64 attending primary healthcare units, selected through multistage random sampling across 50 primary health units from 17 regional health departments of São Paulo. Participants rated barriers and attitudes using 5-point Likert items, which were later condensed in a 3-point scale for analysis. Non-parametric tests assessed associations with sociodemographic factors, screening practices, and knowledge levels.

resultsThe sample was predominantly low-income (40% in the lowest income bracket; 82% without private health insurance), with 87% reporting a Pap smear within the past five years. Key personal and structural barriers included fear of bad news (41%), test results delays (30%), long wait times (30%), and shame (29%). Significant associations were found between lower income and reporting delays in test results (p = 0,020) and long wait times (p = 0,012), as well as between lower education and experiencing delays (p = 0,030) and shame (p = 0,007). Positive attitudes toward screening exceeded 95% overall and were stronger among women who understood the Pap smear's role in early detection (p = 0,026) and improving survival (p = 0,006).

conclusionWhile screening participation was high, persistent socioeconomic disparities in access and personal barriers require targeted interventions. Strengthening primary healthcare systems with patient-centered approaches could improve screening adherence and reduce inequities.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultBrazilFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMiddle AgedPapanicolaou TestPatient Acceptance of Health CareSocioeconomic FactorsVaginal SmearsAttitudesBarriers to Access of Health ServicesCervical CancerHealth DisparitiesKnowledgeMass ScreeningPractice

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.