ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2025
Barriers and attitudes toward cervical cancer screening among eligible women.
Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Physician-Level Determinants of Cervical Cancer Screening Practices: A Socio-Ecological Model-Based Study from Adjara, Georgia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Unpleasant but effective: Newspaper coverage of cancer screening and cancer in the Netherlands from 2010 to 2022.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study examined barriers and attitudes toward cervical cancer screening among eligible women in São Paulo, Brazil, and their associations with sociodemographic factors, screening behaviors, and knowledge.
methodsA survey was conducted with 384 women aged 25-64 attending primary healthcare units, selected through multistage random sampling across 50 primary health units from 17 regional health departments of São Paulo. Participants rated barriers and attitudes using 5-point Likert items, which were later condensed in a 3-point scale for analysis. Non-parametric tests assessed associations with sociodemographic factors, screening practices, and knowledge levels.
resultsThe sample was predominantly low-income (40% in the lowest income bracket; 82% without private health insurance), with 87% reporting a Pap smear within the past five years. Key personal and structural barriers included fear of bad news (41%), test results delays (30%), long wait times (30%), and shame (29%). Significant associations were found between lower income and reporting delays in test results (p = 0,020) and long wait times (p = 0,012), as well as between lower education and experiencing delays (p = 0,030) and shame (p = 0,007). Positive attitudes toward screening exceeded 95% overall and were stronger among women who understood the Pap smear's role in early detection (p = 0,026) and improving survival (p = 0,006).
conclusionWhile screening participation was high, persistent socioeconomic disparities in access and personal barriers require targeted interventions. Strengthening primary healthcare systems with patient-centered approaches could improve screening adherence and reduce inequities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40864370What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.