ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025
Standardization of image quality in dynamic chest radiography: a determination procedure of individualized exposure settings based on the data from plain chest radiography.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In plain chest radiography (CXR), automatic exposure control (AEC) is generally used to standardize image quality. In contrast, dynamic chest radiography (DCR) systems preliminarily require manual setting of tube current-time products (mAs value). Body mass index (BMI) of patients is one of the indexes to determine the mAs value; however, standardization is limited because the anatomical differences are not considered. In this study, for further standardization, we propose a practical procedure to determine the individual mAs value of DCR using data obtained from CXR. To evaluate its effectiveness, we retrospectively analyzed 97 patients who underwent both CXR and DCR on the same day. DCR was performed in the following procedures: (1) obtain the relationship between the mAs value and the exposure indicator (S value, Konica Minolta, Inc.) obtained in CXR acquisition, (2) calculate the mAs value of DCR for the target S value of 2500, and (3) record the S value in DCR. The tube voltages for CXR and DCR were set to 120 kV and 100 kV with a copper filter, respectively. The differences in exposure doses were corrected by measuring the air kerma using a CdTe detector. As a result, the S values of CXR and DCR were 133 ± 13 (Coefficient of Variation (CV) = 9.9%) and 2629 ± 207 (CV = 7.9%), respectively, which were not dependent on the patient size based on evaluating the S values of five classified BMI groups. In conclusion, our proposed procedure enables standardization of the image quality in DCR by optimizing the patient-specific exposure conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40864328What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.