Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40864328›Full record

ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025

Standardization of image quality in dynamic chest radiography: a determination procedure of individualized exposure settings based on the data from plain chest radiography.

Hiroaki Tsutsumi, Kazuki Takegami, Taiga Miura, Masaki Takemitsu, Ayumi Takegami, Shohei Kudomi, Sono Kanoya, Tsunahiko Hirano, Kazuto Matsunaga

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hiroaki TsutsumiDepartment of Radiological Technology, Yamaguchi University Hospital, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Kazuki TakegamiDepartment of Radiological Technology, Yamaguchi University Hospital, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan. kazuki-t@yamaguchi-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4900-1587
Taiga MiuraDepartment of Radiological Technology, Yamaguchi University Hospital, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Masaki TakemitsuDepartment of Radiological Technology, Yamaguchi University Hospital, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Ayumi TakegamiDepartment of Radiological Technology, Yamaguchi University Hospital, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Shohei KudomiDepartment of Radiological Technology, Yamaguchi University Hospital, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Sono KanoyaDepartment of Radiological Technology, Yamaguchi University Hospital, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Tsunahiko HiranoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Disease, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan.
Kazuto MatsunagaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Disease, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, 1-1-1 Minami-Kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In plain chest radiography (CXR), automatic exposure control (AEC) is generally used to standardize image quality. In contrast, dynamic chest radiography (DCR) systems preliminarily require manual setting of tube current-time products (mAs value). Body mass index (BMI) of patients is one of the indexes to determine the mAs value; however, standardization is limited because the anatomical differences are not considered. In this study, for further standardization, we propose a practical procedure to determine the individual mAs value of DCR using data obtained from CXR. To evaluate its effectiveness, we retrospectively analyzed 97 patients who underwent both CXR and DCR on the same day. DCR was performed in the following procedures: (1) obtain the relationship between the mAs value and the exposure indicator (S value, Konica Minolta, Inc.) obtained in CXR acquisition, (2) calculate the mAs value of DCR for the target S value of 2500, and (3) record the S value in DCR. The tube voltages for CXR and DCR were set to 120 kV and 100 kV with a copper filter, respectively. The differences in exposure doses were corrected by measuring the air kerma using a CdTe detector. As a result, the S values of CXR and DCR were 133 ± 13 (Coefficient of Variation (CV) = 9.9%) and 2629 ± 207 (CV = 7.9%), respectively, which were not dependent on the patient size based on evaluating the S values of five classified BMI groups. In conclusion, our proposed procedure enables standardization of the image quality in DCR by optimizing the patient-specific exposure conditions.

Indexed as

Radiation DosageRadiography, ThoracicAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality ControlReference StandardsRetrospective StudiesAutomatic exposure controlDynamic chest radiographyExposure indexPlain chest radiographyScan protocolX-ray spectrum

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.