ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Construction of a prognostic risk-scoring model based on SASP-related genes in patients with skin cutaneous melanoma.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSkin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM) is a highly aggressive and deadly subtype of skin cancer. Lack of efficient biomarkers for prognosis has limited the improvement of survival outcome for patients with SKCM.
methodsIn this study, we obtained RNA-seq data from TCGA and GTEx databases, followed by identification of differential expressed genes, univariate Cox regression, and LASSO regression to identify prognostic SASP-related genes in the TCGA datasets and constructed a prognostic risk-scoring model.
resultsThe establishment of prognostic model was based on the expression levels of 14 SASP-related genes, including ASPRV1, ICAM1, IL2RA, ABCC2, HLA-B, TPMT, ATM, CD59, KIR2DL4, CTLA4, ITGB3, FOXM1, NOX4, and TRIM21. Patients with melanoma who were in the high-risk group had a shorter overall survival (OS), indicating that the model served as an independent prognostic index. Furthermore, we found that the risk score was potentially linked to immune scores, estimate score, immune cell infiltration level, and immunotherapy efficacy.
conclusionsThis study presented a new prognostic model for assessing therapy in melanoma patients, providing a fresh perspective for combating melanoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.