ArticlePediatric radiology2025
Female-to-female aggression in the workplace.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFemale-to-female aggression in the workplace describes behavior by a woman with higher power status that is intended to degrade, ridicule, or undermine the work of a woman with a lesser power status, and may impede the career goals of junior female radiologists. Senior women may or may not be aware of their role in perpetuating this behavior.
objectiveTo characterize the prevalence, impact, and perceptions of female-to-female workplace aggression among pediatric radiologists in order to raise awareness and inform strategies for prevention and intervention. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An adapted version of a validated survey was developed and distributed electronically in October 2022 to all Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR) members. The 17-question survey included both multiple choice and free-text fields. Members were given 2 weeks to respond to the survey with two reminders electronically delivered prior to survey closing. Three questions addressed demographics, 11 questions addressed personal experience with this aggression, and three questions addressed potential causes and handling of this aggression. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize responses. Non-parametric statistics were used to compare group responses.
resultsSurvey response rate was 12% (199/1694) with 73% (144/199) female, 27% (54/199) male, and 0.5% (1/199) nonbinary. Respondents ranged from in-training to>21 years in practice and 25 years to>66 years of age + . Of all respondents, 47% (n=93) have personally been the recipient of female-to-female aggression, and 68% (n=35) have witnessed it. Thirty-six percent (n=71) of respondents admit to exerting this behavior on other women. Most respondents agree that this is a phenomenon limited to a few people rather than being widespread or caused by many; however, 39% (n=76) rank this aggression as a middle or top cause of stress/tension related to their jobs, and 46% (n=88) noted that it had changed or affected their career path. Seventy-six respondents included descriptions of their experiences and 109 had suggestions for solving problems related to female-to-female aggression.
conclusionsFemale-to-female aggression was experienced by 60% of female radiologists during their medical career and may negatively impact the careers of junior female radiologists. Characterizing the extent of this experience in our field will raise awareness and may help prevent or mitigate it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40864289What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.