Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40864269›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2025

Clinical outcomes of combined cataract surgery with iStent inject

Fidan A Aghayeva, Abdelrahman Assaf, Shakriiar Gurbanzade, Ines M Lanzl

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Referral for glaucoma surgery and types of surgery in different European regions in 2025, the EURACCUR study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fidan A AghayevaChiemsee Eye Clinic, Prien on Chiemsee, Germany.
Abdelrahman AssafTechnical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Shakriiar GurbanzadeTechnical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ines M LanzlChiemsee Eye Clinic, Prien on Chiemsee, Germany. info@auge.bayern.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2850-8976

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aims to evaluate and compare intraocular pressure (IOP) change and topical IOP-lowering medication use after combined cataract surgery with iStent inject

methodsRetrospective comparative chart review of 150 patients (150 eyes) with different types of open-angle glaucoma, who were naïve to any previous ocular procedure and underwent combined cataract surgery with iStent

resultsThe median IOP change in the iStent inject

conclusionsThis study shows a statistically significant IOP reduction at 3-, 6- and 12 months and reduction of topical IOP-lowering medications at 12 months after combined cataract surgery with iStent inject

Indexed as

CataractCataract ExtractionGlaucoma Drainage ImplantsGlaucoma, Open-AngleIntraocular PressurePhacoemulsificationVisual AcuityAgedAged, 80 and overAntihypertensive AgentsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAntihypertensive AgentsCataract surgeryGlaucomaIntraocular pressureIOP-lowering medicationsiStentMinimally invasive glaucoma surgery

Identifiers

PMID40864269
PMCPMC12675655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.