Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40864220›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026

Automated overview of complete endoscopies with unsupervised learned descriptors.

O Leon Barbed, Pablo Azagra, Juan Plo, Ana C Murillo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

O Leon BarbedDIIS-i3A, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain. leon@unizar.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8191-6261
Pablo AzagraDIIS-i3A, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Juan PloDIIS-i3A, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Ana C MurilloDIIS-i3A, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigacion 16728Departamento de Educación, Cultura y Deporte, Gobierno de Aragón 16727H2020 Future and Emerging Technologies 16726
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aim to automate the initial analysis of complete endoscopy videos, identifying the sparse relevant content. This facilitates long procedure recording understanding, reduces the clinicians' review time, and facilitates downstream tasks such as video summarization, event detection, and 3D reconstruction.

methodsOur approach extracts endoscopic video frame representations with a learned embedding model. These descriptors are clustered to find visual patterns in the procedure, identifying key scene types (surgery, clear visibility frames, etc.) and enabling segmentation into informative and non-informative video parts.

resultsEvaluation on complete colonoscopy videos presents good performance identifying surgery segments and different visibility conditions. The method produces structured overviews that separate useful segments from irrelevant ones. We illustrate its suitability and benefits as preprocessing for other downstream tasks, such as 3D reconstruction or video summarization.

conclusionOur approach enables automated endoscopy overview generation, helping the clinicians focus on the relevant video content such as good visibility sections and surgery actions. The presented work facilitates faster recording reviewing for clinicians and effective video preprocessing for downstream tasks.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyUnsupervised Machine LearningVideo RecordingHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalEndoscopyRepresentation learningScene classificationUnsupervised learningVideo summarization

Identifiers

PMID40864220
PMCPMC13035558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.