ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2025
Designing the homogeneous competitive bioluminescence-based assay for tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) point-of-care detection.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biosensors for the detection of arthropod-borne veterinary viruses: A comprehensive review.Veterinary and animal science · 2026Review
- Molecular Mimicry by the Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus E Protein: A Hidden Link to Autoimmunity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV), a highly pathogenic infectious agent that causes serious damage to the nervous system is mainly transmitted by Ixodidae ticks. The laboratory methods (immunoassay and the PCR-based one) are successfully used to detect the virus in tick samples thereby avoiding unwarranted immunoprophylaxis. However, there is a need to determine the tick infection outside the laboratory conditions. In this study, we have developed a one-stage (of mix-and-read type) method for detecting virus in biological samples based on split NanoLuc complementation assay. Artificial NanoLuc luciferase split fragments NLuc(N-residue), 17.6 kDa, and NLuc(C-residue), 11 a.a., were genetically fused with the protein prED3 (fragment of the TBEV capsid protein E) or mouse anti-TBEV single-chain antibody 14D5a in all possible variants. The corresponding hybrid proteins were synthesized in E. coli recombinant cells, purified and studied. Assembling of the luciferase fragments into a bioluminescent complex proceeded due to antigen-antibody affinity interaction. The most efficient luciferase complementation was observed for the pair 14D5a-NLucCter + prED3-NLucNter: the integral bioluminescence of the complex was 2.4% of that of the intact luciferase. Using this complex, a single-phase competitive enzyme immunoassay of TBEV-associated targets was developed. A large number of native ticks were analyzed and a statistically significant difference was shown between "healthy" and virus-carrying ticks. Lyophilized all-in-one reagents, reconstituted upon addition of the sample matrices, were developed and tested in model assay. The results offer a basis for the development of a point-of-need portable device for rapid tick detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40864204What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.