ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2025
Suppression of Belowground Volatiles in Maize Depends on Cover Crop Legacy and Genotype.
Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Underground Signals: The Ecological Power of Root Volatiles.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Volatile organic compounds are important chemical signals involved in plant-insect interactions. In recent decades, volatiles have been used in many agricultural applications to help control crop pests, but fewer applications have been developed for belowground pests despite volatile signaling and olfactory cues being crucial for orientation and communication of belowground organisms. Volatile signals also depend heavily on soil characteristics which influence both production and diffusion of these volatile compounds. Cover cropping is one agricultural practice that significantly alters soil properties and has been shown to help control certain insect pests, but there is insufficient data on how cover cropping can affect belowground volatile production and recognition. In this study we explored constitutive and root herbivore induced total belowground volatile emissions in two commercial cultivars of maize (Zea mays L.) planted after different cover crop treatments as well as entomopathogenic nematode (EPN) foraging behavior toward plant cues. Contrary to expectation, we found that volatile emission was significantly reduced in response to herbivore feeding and this response was stronger when maize was planted after certain cover crops. In addition, infective juvenile EPN moved equally toward both herbivore-infested and control plants and were not affected by cover crop treatment. Our results suggest that plant responses to insect damage do not always result in adaptive indirect defenses: in some contexts, herbivores may actually reduce their visibility to natural enemies. Moreover, the plasticity and intensity of these responses depend on both plant genotype and soil legacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.