ArticleBlood advances2025
Risk of synchronous and second primary malignancies in transplant-ineligible patients with multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide.
Article in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractAn increased risk of second primary malignancies (SPMs) was reported for transplant-ineligible (TI) patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) exposed to lenalidomide (Len), with the caveats that Len was often coexposed to alkylating agents and the studies did not exclude synchronous malignancies (SyMs). We aimed to evaluate the respective SyM over SPM risks in TI patients with NDMM treated with Len as frontline therapy. We conducted a high-resolution, population-based cancer registry study, which allowed completeness of the primary end point (SyMs and SPMs) without reporting bias, and provided a cohort more representative of real-life than those in clinical trials. The inclusion period started recently (2018) due to the reimbursement of Len in France. Additional malignancies (AdMs) diagnosed ≤4 months of MM diagnosis were defined as SyMs; those diagnosed >4 months were considered SPMs. The person-year approach was used with an indirect standardization. With a median follow-up of 36 months, 360 consecutive TI patients with NDMM were identified, including 174 treated with Len. In total, 35 patients (9.7%) had an AdM (standardized incidence ratio [SIR], 2.17), 16 (4.4%) had an SyM (SIR, 8.20), and 19 (6.4%) had an SPM (SIR, 1.15). Among patients treated with Len, 12 (6.9%) had an SPM (SIR, 1.28), and cumulative incidence was 3.6% at 3 years. TI patients with NDMM have a high risk of being codiagnosed with an SyM possibly explained by examinations performed at the time of MM diagnosis. In contrast, patients treated with Len who were never exposed to conventional chemotherapy did not seem to have an increased risk of SPM compared with the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.