ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025
Electron-Beam Excited Conductive Atomic Force Microscopy for Back Contact Free, Wafer-Scale and In-Line Compatible Electrical Characterization of 2D Materials.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Concept of 2D van der Waals Nanohybrids for Key Biomedical Applications.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Electron-Beam Excited Conductive Atomic Force Microscopy for Back Contact Free, Wafer-Scale and In-Line Compatible Electrical Characterization of 2D Materials.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrical atomic force microscopies (AFMs) have emerged as leading metrology techniques for evaluating the quality of 2D materials. Their advantages include high-resolution electrical mapping, non-destructive measurement, and the ability to probe nanoscale defects and transport properties. Conductive AFM (C-AFM) has been particularly instrumental, enabling the direct observation of individual vacancies and vacancy clusters, voids, wrinkles, and cracks. Despite this incredible versatility, C-AFM remains a two-probes method, thus it is limited by the need for physical back-contact. Creating this back contact is complex and time-consuming. More importantly, this requirement prevents C-AFM from being a viable in-line metrology technique. Here, it is demonstrated that a low-energy e-beam impinging on the sample surface can be used to perform C-AFM, in a new configuration that is electron-beam (e-beam) excited conductive atomic force microscopy (EBC-AFM). This approach enables comparable results to classic C-AFM sensitivity, while unlocking applications that were not previously possible. After introducing the experimental setup, the main parameters associated with the e-beam and their impact on the C-AFM measurement are studied. Finally, using several 2D materials as testbeds, the competitive electrical mapping capabilities of EBC-AFM for defect assessment are demonstrated. Furthermore, this technique overcomes limitations for studying isolated flakes and enables wafer-scale characterization of 2D materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.