Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40864169›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025

Electron-Beam Excited Conductive Atomic Force Microscopy for Back Contact Free, Wafer-Scale and In-Line Compatible Electrical Characterization of 2D Materials.

Md Ashiqur Rahman Laskar, Sakib Ahmed, Pinakapani Tummala, Alessandro Molle, Alessio Lamperti, Renee Sailus, Youssry Y Botros, Milan Pesic, Rob Davenport, Ondřej Novotný and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Md Ashiqur Rahman LaskarSchool of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4419-0614
Sakib AhmedSchool of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.
Pinakapani TummalaCNR IMM, Unit of Agrate Brianza, via C. Olivetti 2, Agrate Brianza, 20864, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0115-9123
Alessandro MolleCNR IMM, Unit of Agrate Brianza, via C. Olivetti 2, Agrate Brianza, 20864, Italy.
Alessio LampertiCNR IMM, Unit of Agrate Brianza, via C. Olivetti 2, Agrate Brianza, 20864, Italy.
Renee SailusSchool for Matter, Transport and Energy Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.
Youssry Y BotrosApplied Materials Inc., Santa Clara, CA, 95054, USA.
Milan PesicApplied Materials Inc., Santa Clara, CA, 95054, USA.
Rob DavenportApplied Materials Inc., Santa Clara, CA, 95054, USA.
Ondřej NovotnýNenoVision s. r. o., Brno, 61200, Czech Republic.
Jan NeumanNenoVision s. r. o., Brno, 61200, Czech Republic.
Fabrizio ToiaSTMicroelectronics, Via C. Olivetti 2, Agrate Brianza, 20864, Italy.
Ivan Sanchez EsquedaSchool of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6530-8602
Seth Ariel TongaySchool for Matter, Transport and Energy Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8294-984X
Umberto CelanoSchool of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2856-3847

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrical atomic force microscopies (AFMs) have emerged as leading metrology techniques for evaluating the quality of 2D materials. Their advantages include high-resolution electrical mapping, non-destructive measurement, and the ability to probe nanoscale defects and transport properties. Conductive AFM (C-AFM) has been particularly instrumental, enabling the direct observation of individual vacancies and vacancy clusters, voids, wrinkles, and cracks. Despite this incredible versatility, C-AFM remains a two-probes method, thus it is limited by the need for physical back-contact. Creating this back contact is complex and time-consuming. More importantly, this requirement prevents C-AFM from being a viable in-line metrology technique. Here, it is demonstrated that a low-energy e-beam impinging on the sample surface can be used to perform C-AFM, in a new configuration that is electron-beam (e-beam) excited conductive atomic force microscopy (EBC-AFM). This approach enables comparable results to classic C-AFM sensitivity, while unlocking applications that were not previously possible. After introducing the experimental setup, the main parameters associated with the e-beam and their impact on the C-AFM measurement are studied. Finally, using several 2D materials as testbeds, the competitive electrical mapping capabilities of EBC-AFM for defect assessment are demonstrated. Furthermore, this technique overcomes limitations for studying isolated flakes and enables wafer-scale characterization of 2D materials.

Indexed as

2D materialsconductive AFMelectrical characterizationin‐line metrologyMoS2wafer compatible

Identifiers

PMID40864169
PMCPMC12667532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.