Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40864153›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Cellular and circuit features distinguish mouse dentate gyrus semilunar granule cells and granule cells activated during contextual memory formation.

Laura Dovek, Mahboubeh Ahmadi, Krista Marrero, Edward Zagha, Vijayalakshmi Santhakumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura DovekBiomedical Sciences Graduate Program,University of California Riverside, Riverside, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9381-1886
Mahboubeh AhmadiDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, University of California Riverside, Riverside, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0719-3632
Krista MarreroDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, University of California Riverside, Riverside, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3720-8756
Edward ZaghaBiomedical Sciences Graduate Program,University of California Riverside, Riverside, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5892-3746
Vijayalakshmi SanthakumarBiomedical Sciences Graduate Program,University of California Riverside, Riverside, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6278-4187

Funding

Contribution of Innate Immune Receptors to Neurological Dysfunction After Traumatic Brain Injury: Mechanisms and Therapeutic ImplicationsR01NS097750 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI SANTHAKUMAR, VIJAYALAKSHMI · 2016 to 2025
$4.0M
Perisomatic Inhibitory Network Dysfunction in Neurological DiseaseR01NS069861 · NINDS · UNIV OF MED/DENT OF NJ-NJ MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI SANTHAKUMAR, VIJAYALAKSHMI · 2011 to 2022
$3.4M
Inhibitory Network Plasticity in Neurological DiseaseR37NS069861 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI Vijayalakshmi Santhakumar · 2024 to 2026
$2.1M
Cellular and circuit mechanisms of hippocampal dentate engram formation and seizure-induced alterationsF31NS124290 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI DOVEK, LAURA · 2021 to 2023
$126k
NIH HHS F31NS124290NIH HHS R01NS097750NIH HHS R37NS069861NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS124290NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS069861NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS097750NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS069861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dentate gyrus is critical for spatial memory formation and shows task-related activation of cellular ensembles considered as memory engrams. Semilunar granule cells (SGCs), a sparse dentate projection neuron subtype, were reported to be enriched among behaviorally activated neurons. By examining SGCs and granule cells (GCs) labeled during contextual memory formation in TRAP2 mice, we empirically tested competing hypotheses for GC and SGC recruitment into memory ensembles. Consistent with more excitable neurons being recruited into memory ensembles, SGCs showed greater sustained firing than GCs. Additionally, labeled SGCs showed less adapting firing than unlabeled SGCs. The lack of glutamatergic connections between behaviorally labeled SGCs and GCs in our recordings is inconsistent with SGC-driven local circuit feedforward excitation underlying ensemble recruitment. Moreover, there was little evidence for individual SGCs or labeled neuronal ensembles supporting lateral inhibition of unlabeled neurons. Instead, labeled GCs and SGCs received more spontaneous excitatory synaptic inputs than their unlabeled counterparts. Labeled neuronal pairs received more temporally correlated spontaneous excitatory synaptic inputs than labeled-unlabeled neuronal pairs. These findings challenge the proposal that SGCs drive dentate GC ensemble refinement, while supporting a role for intrinsic excitability and correlated inputs in preferential SGC recruitment to contextual memory engrams.

Indexed as

Dentate GyrusMemoryNeuronsAnimalsMaleMicecircuitengramhippocampusinhibitionmemorymouseneurosciencesemilunar granule cell

Identifiers

PMID40864153
PMCPMC12387755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.