Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40864065›Full record

ReviewToxins2025

Botulinum Toxin-A, Generating a Hypothesis for Orofacial Pain Therapy.

Yair Sharav, Rafael Benoliel, Yaron Haviv

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yair SharavDepartment of Oral Medicine, Sedation and Imaging, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.
Rafael BenolielRutgers School of Dental Medicine, Newark, NJ 07103, USA.
Yaron HavivDepartment of Oral Medicine, Sedation and Imaging, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orofacial pain encompasses a spectrum of disorders ranging from musculoskeletal disorders, such as myofascial pain, and temporomandibular disorders to neuropathic situations, such as trigeminal neuralgia and painful post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathy, and neurovascular pain such as orofacial migraine and cluster orofacial pain. Each require tailored prophylactic pharmacotherapy, such as carbamazepine, gabapentin, pregabalin, amitriptyline, metoprolol, and topiramate. Yet a substantial subset of patients remains refractory. Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) has demonstrated growing efficacy in the treatment of multiple forms of orofacial pain, which covers the whole range of these disorders. We describe the analgesic properties of BoNT-A for each of the three following orofacial pain disorders: neuropathic, myofascial, and neurovascular. Then, we conclude with a section on the neuromodulatory mechanisms of BoNT-A. This lays the basis for the generation of a hypothesis for the segmental therapeutic action of BoNT-A on the whole range of orofacial pain disorders. In addition, the advantage of BoNT-A for providing a safe sustained effect after a single application for chronic pain prophylaxis is discussed, as opposed to the daily use of current conventional prophylactic medications. Finally, we summarize the clinical applications of BoNT-A for chronic orofacial pain therapy.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsBotulinum Toxins, Type AFacial PainAnimalsHumansAnalgesicsBotulinum Toxins, Type ABoNT-Abotulinum toxinmigraineneuromodulationneuropathic painone-time pain prophylaxisorofacial paintemporomandibular disordertrigeminal neuralgia

Identifiers

PMID40864065
PMCPMC12389898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.