ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology2025
A Polygenic Risk Score to Predict Incident Heart Failure Across the Spectrum of Cardiovascular Risk.
Article in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Mechanisms and Multi-Omics Integration in Heart Failure: From Pathophysiology to Precision Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Are Atrial Fibrillation Risk Loci Universally Applicable? Insights from Whole-Genome Sequencing in a Polish Population.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe clinical utility of a heart failure (HF) polygenic risk score (PRS) is uncertain.
objectivesThe purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of an HF PRS to predict new-onset HF in individuals across the spectrum of cardiovascular risk.
methodsAn HF PRS (>1 million single nucleotide variations) was used to stratify individuals from 7 clinical studies to low (quintile [Q] 1), intermediate (Q2-Q4), or high (Q5) genetic risk. In 6 trials of patients at elevated cardiovascular risk, HRs adjusted for clinical factors were derived for the risk of hospitalization for HF using Cox-PH models, and discrimination and calibration was explored. Analyses were conducted in a separate data set of individuals at low cardiovascular risk.
resultsWe studied 74,897 patients without HF, of which 51,627 were at elevated cardiovascular risk (median age 65 years; 71% men; median follow-up 2.5 years). After adjusting for clinical factors, individuals with intermediate and high HF PRS carried a 2- and 5-fold increased rate of new-onset HF, respectively (intermediate risk: HR
conclusionsAn HF PRS is a strong and independent predictor for new-onset HF in individuals across the spectrum of cardiovascular risk. The polygenic contribution to HF is complementary to established clinical risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.