ArticleNeurology international2025
Effect of Cilostazol in the Expression of Biomarkers and Neurological Outcome Following Experimentally Induced Cerebrovascular Accident-Experimental Protocol.
Article in Neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveSeveral strategies have been described for stroke prevention, and the most commonly used medication is aspirin. Cilostazol, which is a substance with a pleiotropic effect, is still not well investigated. In this study, we aimed to delineate the effects of mono- and combinatorial pre-treatment upon neurological status and biomarkers, namely protein S100b, GFAP, procalcitonin, and galectin-3, following stroke.
methodsTwelve-week-old Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to four groups, each containing six rats: control group (normal saline), cilostazol group (30 mg/kg/daily), aspirin group (10 mg/kg/daily), and aspirin/cilostazol group. Each substance was administered by gavage for four weeks. All animals were subjected to cerebral ischemia for 2 h using intraluminal middle cerebral artery occlusion. A neurological examination was performed, serum concentrations of biomarkers were determined, and the animals were then sacrificed.
resultsAll treatment groups exhibited variations in the severity of immediate neurological presentation. Unlike the control group, where all rats presented with severe focal neurology or mortality, most rats in the treatment groups displayed no to moderate focal neurology. Moreover, the aspirin/cilostazol group consistently exhibited significantly lower levels in the studied biomarkers compared to other groups.
conclusionsCo-administration of cilostazol and aspirin significantly ameliorates the immediate expression of the studied biomarkers. Further large-scale studies are needed to investigate the effect of combined therapy for primary and secondary prevention of stroke, using not only serum biomarkers but other specific clinical and laboratory endpoints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.