ReviewToxics2025
Aquatic Microcosms in Ecotoxicology: The Community-Level Ecological Risk Assessment of Pollutants.
Review in Toxics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microcosm technology serves as a sophisticated tool for simulating natural ecosystems, facilitating the examination of pollutants' ecological impacts across population, community, and ecosystem scales. Currently, this technology finds extensive application in ecological toxicology and ecological risk assessment research. This concise review highlights the utility of microcosm technology in ecotoxicology, detailing the establishment of aquatic microcosms and analyzing key research trends to assess the ecological impacts of pollutants. It emphasizes the evaluation of pesticides, industrial chemicals, and heavy metals, providing a comparative analysis of safety thresholds derived from microcosm studies versus other methods. Finally, the review underscores the four urgent directions for future exploration: (a) track pollutant metabolites in microcosms; (b) develop microcosms with diverse species for natural ecosystem mimicry; (c) use DNA macrobarcoding to assess zooplankton and link it to species abundance; (d) study reasons behind no observed effect concentration (NOEC) vs. the 95% harmless concentration (HC5) values in microcosm studies. The determination of these directions helps to fill the gaps in understanding the fate and effects of pollutants within controlled ecosystem simulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.