ArticleToxics2025
Genome-Scale Metabolic Modeling Predicts Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance-Mediated Early Perturbations in Liver Metabolism.
Article in Toxics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- PFAS Exposure and Metabolic Disorders: Mechanistic Insights into Lipid and Glucose Homeostasis.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Current Research Advances and Future Prospects on Microbial Consortia for Sustainable PFAS Remediation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- A systems-level integration of liver-kidney transcriptomics and genome-scale metabolic models reveals organ-specific injury mechanisms.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are widespread in the environment, bioaccumulate in humans, and lead to disease and organ injury, such as liver steatosis. However, we lack a clear understanding of how these chemicals cause organ-level toxicity. Here, we aimed to analyze PFAS-induced metabolic perturbations in male and female rat livers by combining a genome-scale metabolic model (GEM) and toxicogenomics. The combined approach overcomes the limitations of the individual methods by taking into account the interaction between multiple genes for metabolic reactions and using gene expression to constrain the predicted mechanistic possibilities. We obtained transcriptomic data from an acute exposure study, where male and female rats received a daily PFAS dose for five consecutive days, followed by liver transcriptome measurement. We integrated the transcriptome expression data with a rat GEM to computationally predict the metabolic activity in each rat's liver, compare it between the control and PFAS-exposed rats, and predict the benchmark dose (BMD) at which each chemical induced metabolic changes. Overall, our results suggest that PFAS-induced metabolic changes occurred primarily within the lipid and amino acid pathways and were similar between the sexes but varied in the extent of change per dose based on sex and PFAS type. Specifically, we identified that PFASs affect fatty acid-related pathways (biosynthesis, oxidation, and sphingolipid metabolism), energy metabolism, protein metabolism, and inflammatory and inositol metabolite pools, which have been associated with fatty liver and/or insulin resistance. Based on these results, we hypothesize that PFAS exposure induces changes in liver metabolism and makes the organ sensitive to metabolic diseases in both sexes. Furthermore, we conclude that male rats are more sensitive to PFAS-induced metabolic aberrations in the liver than female rats. This combined approach using GEM-based predictions and BMD analysis can help develop mechanistic hypotheses regarding how toxicant exposure leads to metabolic disruptions and how these effects may differ between the sexes, thereby assisting in the metabolic risk assessment of toxicants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.