ReviewToxics2025
Epigenetic and Genotoxic Mechanisms of PFAS-Induced Neurotoxicity: A Molecular and Transgenerational Perspective.
Review in Toxics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exposure to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Causes Dental Developmental Anomalies: Underrecognized Risk of Fluoride Bioaccumulation.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
- Environmental PFOA Exposure Alters Early Developmental Programming during the Maternal-Zygotic Transition.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- PFAS and One Health: integrating human, animal, and environmental perspectives.Archives of toxicology · 2026Review
- Microbial and molecular approaches for PFAS transformation in soils: prospects and limitations.RSC advances · 2026Review
- The maternal-to-zygotic transition is a critical window for PFOA-induced disruption of developmental programming.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Prenatal PFAS exposure and offspring health: evidence review and implications for intergenerational risk assessment.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Persistent pollutants and the developing brain: the role of PFAS in neurodevelopmental disorders.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are persistent environmental pollutants that continue to raise concern owing to their ability to accumulate in living organisms. In recent years, a growing body of research has shown that PFAS can exert their toxicity through disruption of both DNA integrity and epigenetic regulation. This includes changes in DNA methylation patterns, histone modifications, chromatin remodeling, and interference with DNA repair mechanisms. These molecular-level alterations can impair transcriptional regulation and cellular homeostasis, contributing to genomic instability and long-term biological dysfunction. In neural systems, PFAS exposure appears particularly concerning. It affects key regulators of neurodevelopment, such as BDNF, synaptic plasticity genes, and inflammatory mediators. Importantly, epigenetic dysregulation extends to non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), including microRNAs (miRNAs) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), which mediate post-transcriptional silencing and chromatin remodeling. Although direct evidence of transgenerational neurotoxicity is still emerging, animal studies provide compelling hints. Persistent changes in germline epigenetic profiles and transcriptomic alterations suggest that developmental reprogramming might be heritable by future generations. Additionally, PFAS modulate nuclear receptor signaling (e.g., PPARγ), further linking environmental cues to chromatin-level gene regulation. Altogether, these findings underscore a mechanistic framework in which PFAS disrupt neural development and cognitive function via conserved epigenetic and genotoxic mechanisms. Understanding how these upstream alterations affect long-term neurodevelopmental and neurobehavioral outcomes is critical for improving risk assessment and guiding future interventions. This review underscores the need for integrative research on PFAS-induced chromatin disruptions, particularly across developmental stages, and their potential to impact future generations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.