ArticleToxics2025
Adsorptive Removal Behavior of Two Activated Carbons for Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phosphate Dissolved in Water.
Article in Toxics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate (P204) is widely used in extraction processes in the nuclear and rare earth industries. However, its high solubility in water results in high levels of total organic carbon and phosphorus in aqueous environments, and may also lead to radioactive contamination when it is used to combine with radionuclides. In this paper, we characterized a coconut shell activated carbon (CSAC) and a coal-based activated carbon (CBAC) for the adsorption of P204 and then evaluated their adsorption performance through batch and column experiments. The results found that, except for the main carbon matrix, CSAC and CBAC carried rich oxygen-containing functional groups and a small amount of inorganic substances. Both adsorbents had porous structures with pore diameters less than 4 nm. CSAC and CBAC showed good removal performance for P204 under low pH conditions, with removal efficiencies significantly higher than those of commonly used adsorption resins (XAD-4 and IRA900). The adsorption kinetics of P204 conformed to the pseudo-second-order kinetic model, and the adsorption isotherms conformed to the Langmuir model, indicating a monolayer chemical reaction mechanism. Both adsorbents exhibited strong anti-interference capabilities; their adsorption performance for P204 did not change greatly with the ambient temperature or the concentrations of common interfering ions. Column experiments demonstrated that CSAC could effectively fix dissolved P204 with a removal efficiency exceeding 90%. The fixed P204 could be desorbed with acetone. The findings provide an effective method for the recovery of P204 and the regeneration of spent activated carbon, which shows promise for practical applications in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.