ArticleSports (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Influence of Anthropometric Characteristics and Muscle Performance on Punch Impact.
Article in Sports (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of Specific Training Programs on Punch Performance.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the known relevance of punch impact in boxing, limited evidence exists regarding how anthropometric and muscle performance variables contribute to it. This study investigated the relationship between anthropometric characteristics, muscle power and strength performance, and punch impact power in 69 boxing practitioners (mean ± SD age: 27.0 ± 6.1 years). Anthropometric variables (body height (BH), armspan (AS), body mass (BM)) and muscle power and strength tests (countermovement jump (CMJ), one repetition maximum in bench press (1RM BP), and handgrip strength (HS)) were assessed. Punch impact power was assessed with PowerKube (PK), a specific device designed to measure punch impact power. Punch impact power was positively correlated with BH, AS, and BM. Linear regression indicated that BH and AS explained about 36% of the variance in Straight punch impact power and 30-34% in Hook punch impact power. BM showed weaker predictive capacity, explaining 10% of the variance in Straight punch impact power and 11% in Hook punch impact power. When comparing punch impact power differences across groups with varying BH, AS, and BM, it was found that groups with High BH exhibited higher punch impact power than the groups with Low and Medium BH for both Straight and Hook punches. For AS, the High AS group also demonstrated higher punch impact power, with similar trends for BM, where significant differences were observed only between the High and Low BM groups. Additionally, our findings confirm significant relationships between anthropometric characteristics, muscle power, and strength performance. These findings highlight the importance of a comprehensive assessment of anthropometric profiles, alongside muscle power and strength evaluations, to better predict punch impact power. This approach provides valuable insights for boxing training and may also inform exercise programming for the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.