Article in Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Amela KujovićDepartment of Biology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Katja KavklerInstitute for the Protection of Cultural Heritage of Slovenia, Poljanska 40, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Michel Alexander Wilson-HernandezCentro de Investigación en Dinámica Celular, Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias Básicas y Aplicadas, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca CP 62209, Morelos, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0000-1092-3907
Miloš VittoriDepartment of Biology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Luen ZidarDepartment of Biology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Cene GostinčarDepartment of Biology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-0149-3674
Kristina SepčićDepartment of Biology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-4023-5379
Yordanis Pérez-LlanoCentro de Investigación en Dinámica Celular, Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias Básicas y Aplicadas, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca CP 62209, Morelos, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-0254-2239
Ramón Alberto Batista-GarcíaCentro de Investigación en Dinámica Celular, Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias Básicas y Aplicadas, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca CP 62209, Morelos, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-1032-0767
Nina Gunde-CimermanDepartment of Biology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-9464-3263
Polona ZalarDepartment of Biology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-4317-5305
Funding
MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and FSE RYC2022-037554-INational Council of Humanities, Sciences and Technologies, (CONAHCyT), Government of Mexico Master fellowshipThe Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency ARIS P1-0198 (Molecular Biology of Microorganisms)The Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency ARIS P4-0432 (Marine and microbial Biotechnology)The Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency MRIC UL, I0-0022 (IC Mycosmo)The Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency Research project ARIS J7-1815 (Restoration of moldy canvas paintings: improvement or deterioration?)The Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency Young Researcher Grant to A. K.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Canvas paintings are prone to biodeterioration due to their complex chemical composition, which can support fungal growth even under controlled conditions. This study evaluated the susceptibility of common synthetic restoration materials-Lascaux glues (303 HV, 498 HV), Acrylharz P550, BEVA 371, Laropal A81, and Regalrez 1094-to degradation by fourteen xerotolerant/xerophilic fungal strains. All tested
Indexed as
biodeteriorationenzymeslow water activitytranscriptomics
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Degradation of Synthetic Restoration Materials by Xerotolerant/Xerophilic Fungi Contaminating Canvas Paintings. · full record | OpenQuestion