Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40863486›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2025

The Contribution of AIDA (Artificial Intelligence Dystocia Algorithm) to Cesarean Section Within Robson Classification Group.

Antonio Malvasi, Lorenzo E Malgieri, Michael Stark, Edoardo Di Naro, Dan Farine, Giorgio Maria Baldini, Miriam Dellino, Murat Yassa, Andrea Tinelli, Antonella Vimercati and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Antonio MalvasiObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Lorenzo E MalgieriThe New European Surgical Academy (NESA), 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0606-6425
Michael StarkThe New European Surgical Academy (NESA), 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1481-9506
Edoardo Di NaroObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Dan FarineDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1Z5, Canada.
Giorgio Maria BaldiniObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5061-8007
Miriam DellinoObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Murat YassaClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Şehit Prof. Dr. İlhan Varank Sancaktepe Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences Turkey, 34785 İstanbul, Turkey.
Andrea TinelliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and CERICSAL (CEntro di RIcerca Clinico SALentino), "Veris delli Ponti Hospital", 73020 Scorrano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8426-8490
Antonella VimercatiObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9862-1619
Tommaso DifonzoObstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0009-0004-9711-3497

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global cesarean section (CS) rates continue to rise, with the Robson classification widely used for analysis. However, Robson Group 2A patients (nulliparous women with induced labor) show disproportionately high CS rates that cannot be fully explained by demographic factors alone. This study explored how the Artificial Intelligence Dystocia Algorithm (AIDA) could enhance the Robson system by providing detailed information on geometric dystocia, thereby facilitating better understanding of factors contributing to CS and developing more targeted reduction strategies. The authors conducted a comprehensive literature review analyzing both classification systems across multiple databases and developed a theoretical framework for integration. AIDA categorized labor cases into five classes (0-4) by analyzing four key geometric parameters measured through intrapartum ultrasound: angle of progression (AoP), asynclitism degree (AD), head-symphysis distance (HSD), and midline angle (MLA). Significant asynclitism (AD ≥ 7.0 mm) was strongly associated with CS regardless of other parameters, potentially explaining many "failure to progress" cases in Robson Group 2A patients. The proposed integration created a combined classification providing both population-level and individual geometric risk assessment. The integration of AIDA with the Robson classification represented a potentially valuable advancement in CS risk assessment, combining population-level stratification with individual-level geometric assessment to enable more personalized obstetric care. Future validation studies across diverse settings are needed to establish clinical utility.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceasynclitismcesarean sectiondystociaintrapartum ultrasoundlabormalpositionmalrotationRobson classificationvaginal operative delivery

Identifiers

PMID40863486
PMCPMC12387988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.