ArticleJournal of imaging2025
Digital Image Processing and Convolutional Neural Network Applied to Detect Mitral Stenosis in Echocardiograms: Clinical Decision Support.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Unimodal to multimodal: a systematic review of predictive machine learning models for valvular heart diseases.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The mitral valve is the most susceptible to pathological alterations, such as mitral stenosis, characterized by failure of the valve to open completely. In this context, the objective of this study was to apply digital image processing (DIP) and develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) to provide decision support for specialists in the diagnosis of mitral stenosis based on transesophageal echocardiography examinations. The following procedures were implemented: acquisition of echocardiogram exams; application of DIP; use of augmentation techniques; and development of a CNN. The DIP classified 26.7% cases without stenosis, 26.7% with mild stenosis, 13.3% with moderate stenosis, and 33.3% with severe stenosis. A CNN was initially developed to classify videos into those four categories. However, the number of acquired exams was insufficient to effectively train the model for this purpose. So, the final model was trained to differentiate between videos with or without stenosis, achieving an accuracy of 92% with a loss of 0.26. The results demonstrate that both DIP and CNN are effective in distinguishing between cases with and without stenosis. Moreover, DIP was capable of classifying varying degrees of stenosis severity-mild, moderate, and severe-highlighting its potential as a valuable tool in clinical decision support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.