ArticleJournal of imaging2025
Extract Nutritional Information from Bilingual Food Labels Using Large Language Models.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Food product labels serve as a critical source of information, providing details about nutritional content, ingredients, and health implications. These labels enable Food and Drug Authorities (FDA) to ensure compliance and take necessary health-related and logistics actions. Additionally, product labels are essential for online grocery stores to offer reliable nutrition facts and empower customers to make informed dietary decisions. Unfortunately, product labels are typically available in image formats, requiring organizations and online stores to manually transcribe them-a process that is not only time-consuming but also highly prone to human error, especially with multilingual labels that add complexity to the task. Our study investigates the challenges and effectiveness of leveraging large language models (LLMs) to extract nutritional elements and values from multilingual food product labels, with a specific focus on Arabic and English. A comprehensive empirical analysis was conducted using a manually curated dataset of 294 food product labels, comprising 588 transcribed nutritional elements and values in both languages, which served as the ground truth for evaluation. The findings reveal that while LLMs performed better in extracting English elements and values compared to Arabic, our post-processing techniques significantly enhanced their accuracy, with GPT-4o outperforming GPT-4V and Gemini.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.