ArticleJournal of imaging2025
Enhancing YOLOv5 for Autonomous Driving: Efficient Attention-Based Object Detection on Edge Devices.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Label-Efficient PCB Defect Detection with an ECA-DCN-Lite-BiFPN-CARAFE-Enhanced YOLOv5 and Single-Stage Semi-Supervision.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
On-road vision-based systems rely on object detection to ensure vehicle safety and efficiency, making it an essential component of autonomous driving. Deep learning methods show high performance; however, they often require special hardware due to their large sizes and computational complexity, which makes real-time deployment on edge devices expensive. This study proposes lightweight object detection models based on the YOLOv5s architecture, known for its speed and accuracy. The models integrate advanced channel attention strategies, specifically the ECA module and SE attention blocks, to enhance feature selection while minimizing computational overhead. Four models were developed and trained on the KITTI dataset. The models were analyzed using key evaluation metrics to assess their effectiveness in real-time autonomous driving scenarios, including precision, recall, and mean average precision (mAP). BaseECAx2 emerged as the most efficient model for edge devices, achieving the lowest GFLOPs (13) and smallest model size (9.1 MB) without sacrificing performance. The BaseSE-ECA model demonstrated outstanding accuracy in vehicle detection, reaching a precision of 96.69% and an mAP of 98.4%, making it ideal for high-precision autonomous driving scenarios. We also assessed the models' robustness in more challenging environments by training and testing them on the BDD-100K dataset. While the models exhibited reduced performance in complex scenarios involving low-light conditions and motion blur, this evaluation highlights potential areas for improvement in challenging real-world driving conditions. This study bridges the gap between affordability and performance, presenting lightweight, cost-effective solutions for integration into real-time autonomous vehicle systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.