ReviewJournal of imaging2025
Deep Learning Techniques for Prostate Cancer Analysis and Detection: Survey of the State of the Art.
Review in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deep learning for detecting early gastric cancer with white-light endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
- Automated Prostate Cancer Detection on T2-Weighted MRI Using a Dual-Stream Attention Network: A Study on Private Saudi Clinical Data and Public Benchmark Datasets.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Deep Learning Based Computer-Aided Detection of Prostate Cancer Metastases in Bone Scintigraphy: An Experimental Analysis.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in prostate biopsy: diagnostic applications, risk stratification, and precision oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The human interpretation of medical images, especially for the detection of cancer in the prostate, has traditionally been a time-consuming and challenging process. Manual examination for the detection of prostate cancer is not only time-consuming but also prone to errors, carrying the risk of an excess biopsy due to the inherent limitations of human visual interpretation. With the technical advancements and rapid growth of computer resources, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models have been experimentally used for medical image analysis, particularly in lesion detection. However, several state-of-the-art models have shown promising results. There are still challenges when analysing prostate lesion images due to the distinctive and complex nature of medical images. This study offers an elaborate review of the techniques that are used to diagnose prostate cancer using medical images. The goal is to provide a comprehensive and valuable resource that helps researchers develop accurate and autonomous models for effectively detecting prostate cancer. This paper is structured as follows: First, we outline the issues with prostate lesion detection. We then review the methods for analysing prostate lesion images and classification approaches. We then examine convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures and explore their applications in deep learning (DL) for image-based prostate cancer diagnosis. Finally, we provide an overview of prostate cancer datasets and evaluation metrics in deep learning. In conclusion, this review analyses key findings, highlights the challenges in prostate lesion detection, and evaluates the effectiveness and limitations of current deep learning techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.