Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40863464›Full record

ReviewJournal of imaging2025

Deep Learning Techniques for Prostate Cancer Analysis and Detection: Survey of the State of the Art.

Olushola Olawuyi, Serestina Viriri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Olushola OlawuyiSchool of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 3629, South Africa.ORCID 0009-0001-5043-8612
Serestina ViririSchool of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 3629, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2850-8645

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human interpretation of medical images, especially for the detection of cancer in the prostate, has traditionally been a time-consuming and challenging process. Manual examination for the detection of prostate cancer is not only time-consuming but also prone to errors, carrying the risk of an excess biopsy due to the inherent limitations of human visual interpretation. With the technical advancements and rapid growth of computer resources, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models have been experimentally used for medical image analysis, particularly in lesion detection. However, several state-of-the-art models have shown promising results. There are still challenges when analysing prostate lesion images due to the distinctive and complex nature of medical images. This study offers an elaborate review of the techniques that are used to diagnose prostate cancer using medical images. The goal is to provide a comprehensive and valuable resource that helps researchers develop accurate and autonomous models for effectively detecting prostate cancer. This paper is structured as follows: First, we outline the issues with prostate lesion detection. We then review the methods for analysing prostate lesion images and classification approaches. We then examine convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures and explore their applications in deep learning (DL) for image-based prostate cancer diagnosis. Finally, we provide an overview of prostate cancer datasets and evaluation metrics in deep learning. In conclusion, this review analyses key findings, highlights the challenges in prostate lesion detection, and evaluates the effectiveness and limitations of current deep learning techniques.

Indexed as

deep learningprostate cancerprostate cancer detectionsurvey of state of the art

Identifiers

PMID40863464
PMCPMC12387416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.