Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40863462›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2025

Synthetic Scientific Image Generation with VAE, GAN, and Diffusion Model Architectures.

Zineb Sordo, Eric Chagnon, Zixi Hu, Jeffrey J Donatelli, Peter Andeer, Peter S Nico, Trent Northen, Daniela Ushizima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zineb SordoApplied Math and Computational Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-3528-5874
Eric ChagnonApplied Math and Computational Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-7443-5721
Zixi HuApplied Math and Computational Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5365-7351
Jeffrey J DonatelliApplied Math and Computational Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-7173-0174
Peter AndeerEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3554-2008
Peter S NicoEarth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4180-9397
Trent NorthenEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8404-3259
Daniela UshizimaApplied Math and Computational Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7363-9468

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generative AI (genAI) has emerged as a powerful tool for synthesizing diverse and complex image data, offering new possibilities for scientific imaging applications. This review presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of leading generative architectures, ranging from Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) to Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) on through to Diffusion Models, in the context of scientific image synthesis. We examine each model's foundational principles, recent architectural advancements, and practical trade-offs. Our evaluation, conducted on domain-specific datasets including microCT scans of rocks and composite fibers, as well as high-resolution images of plant roots, integrates both quantitative metrics (SSIM, LPIPS, FID, CLIPScore) and expert-driven qualitative assessments. Results show that GANs, particularly StyleGAN, produce images with high perceptual quality and structural coherence. Diffusion-based models for inpainting and image variation, such as DALL-E 2, delivered high realism and semantic alignment but generally struggled in balancing visual fidelity with scientific accuracy. Importantly, our findings reveal limitations of standard quantitative metrics in capturing scientific relevance, underscoring the need for domain-expert validation. We conclude by discussing key challenges such as model interpretability, computational cost, and verification protocols, and discuss future directions where generative AI can drive innovation in data augmentation, simulation, and hypothesis generation in scientific research.

Indexed as

diffusionGenerative Adversarial Networksgenerative AIimage generationsynthetic data

Identifiers

PMID40863462
PMCPMC12387873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.