Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40863460›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2025

The Role of Radiomic Analysis and Different Machine Learning Models in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.

Eleni Bekou, Ioannis Seimenis, Athanasios Tsochatzis, Karafyllia Tziagkana, Nikolaos Kelekis, Savas Deftereos, Nikolaos Courcoutsakis, Michael I Koukourakis, Efstratios Karavasilis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eleni BekouMedical Physics Laboratory, School of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.ORCID 0009-0002-1290-1802
Ioannis SeimenisMedical Physics Laboratory, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-3665-5271
Athanasios TsochatzisYgeia Private Hospital, 15123 Athens, Greece.
Karafyllia TziagkanaDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Nikolaos KelekisResearch Unit of Radiology and Medical Imaging, 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.
Savas DeftereosDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Nikolaos CourcoutsakisDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Michael I KoukourakisDepartment of Radiotherapy/Oncology, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-2324-699X
Efstratios KaravasilisMedical Physics Laboratory, School of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020, INCISIVE project 952179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy in men. Precise grading is crucial for the effective treatment approaches of PCa. Machine learning (ML) applied to biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (bpMRI) radiomics holds promise for improving PCa diagnosis and prognosis. This study investigated the efficiency of seven ML models to diagnose the different PCa grades, changing the input variables. Our studied sample comprised 214 men who underwent bpMRI in different imaging centers. Seven ML algorithms were compared using radiomic features extracted from T2-weighted (T2W) and diffusion-weighted (DWI) MRI, with and without the inclusion of Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) values. The performance of the models was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The models' performance was strongly dependent on the input parameters. Radiomic features derived from T2WI and DWI, whether used independently or in combination, demonstrated limited clinical utility, with AUC values ranging from 0.703 to 0.807. However, incorporating the PSA index significantly improved the models' efficiency, regardless of lesion location or degree of malignancy, resulting in AUC values ranging from 0.784 to 1.00. There is evidence that ML methods, in combination with radiomic analysis, can contribute to solving differential diagnostic problems of prostate cancers. Also, optimization of the analysis method is critical, according to the results of our study.

Indexed as

biparametric magnetic resonance imagingmachine learningprostate cancerprostate cancer diagnosisprostate-specific antigenradiomics

Identifiers

PMID40863460
PMCPMC12387180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.