ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2025
The Evolving Landscape of Novel and Old Biomarkers in Localized High-Risk Prostate Cancer: State of the Art, Clinical Utility, and Limitations Toward Precision Oncology.
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expression of progranulin (GP88) protein appears as an independent prognostic factor for clinical progression in high-risk prostate cancer patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multimodal artificial intelligence in urologic precision oncology: from algorithm to translational medicine (a systemized narrative review).Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Precision Care for Hereditary Urologic Cancers: Genetic Testing, Counseling, Surveillance, and Therapeutic Implications.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-risk prostate cancer (PC) accounts for 50-75% of 10-year relapse after primary treatment. Routine clinicopathological parameters for PC patient stratification have proven insufficient to inform clinical decisions in this setting. Tumor genomic profiling allowed overcoming the limits of diagnostic accuracy in the field of PC, integrated with radiomic features, automated platforms, evaluation of patient-related factors (age, performance status, comorbidity) and tumor-related factors (risk class, volume, T stage). In this scenario, the use of biomarkers to guide decision-making in localized, high-risk PC is evolving actively and rapidly. Additional tests for prostate-specific antigen have demonstrated superior sensitivity and specificity for detecting clinically significant PC, as well as commercially available genomic classifiers improving the risk prediction of disease recurrence/progression/metastasis, in combination with common clinical variables. This narrative review aimed to summarize the state of the art on the utility and evolution of old and emerging biomarkers in the diagnosis and prognosis of localized, high-risk PC, and the potential for their application in clinical practice. We focused on the theoretical molecular foundation of prostate carcinogenesis and explored the impact of genomic profiling, next-generation sequencing, and artificial intelligence in the extrapolation of customized features able to predict disease aggressiveness and possibly drive personalized therapeutic decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.