Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40863418›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2025

The Carotid Siphon as a Pulsatility Modulator for Brain Protection: Role of Arterial Calcification Formation.

Pim A de Jong, Daniel Bos, Huiberdina L Koek, Pieter T Deckers, Netanja I Harlianto, Ynte M Ruigrok, Wilko Spiering, Jaco Zwanenburg, Willem P Th M Mali

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pim A de JongDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4840-6854
Daniel BosDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Huiberdina L KoekDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0938-6232
Pieter T DeckersDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5476-547X
Netanja I HarliantoDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8196-3949
Ynte M RuigrokDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5396-2989
Wilko SpieringDepartment of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2493-6407
Jaco ZwanenburgCenter for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Willem P Th M MaliDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4391-0904

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A healthy vasculature with well-regulated perfusion and pulsatility is essential for the brain. One vascular structure that has received little attention is the carotid siphon. The proximal portion of the siphon is stiff due to the narrow location in the skull base, whilst the distal portion is highly flexible. This flexible part in combination with the specific curves lead to lower pulsatility at the cost of energy deposition in the arterial wall. This deposited energy contributes to damage and calcification. Severe siphon calcification stiffens the distal part of the siphon, leading to less damping of the pulsatility. Increased blood flow pulsatility is a possible cause of stroke and cognitive disorders. In this review, based on comprehensive multimodality imaging, we first describe the anatomy and physiology of the carotid siphon. Subsequently, we review the in vivo imaging data, which indeed suggest that the siphon attenuates pulsatility. Finally, the data as available in the literature are shown to provide convincing evidence that severe siphon calcifications and the calcification pattern are linked to incident stroke and dementia. Interventional studies are required to test whether this association is causal and how an assessment of pulsatility and the siphon calcification pattern can improve personalized medicine, working to prevent and treat brain disease.

Indexed as

arterial calcificationcarotid arterydementiaphysiologystroke

Identifiers

PMID40863418
PMCPMC12387167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.