ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2025
Minimally Invasive Surgical Strategies for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: An Evolving Role in Contemporary Cardiac Surgery.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation during mitral valve surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- The MAZE procedure in atrial fibrillation: An evolution of rhythm surgery.Indian pacing and electrophysiology journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation remains the most frequent sustained arrhythmia, particularly in the elderly population, and is associated with increased risks of stroke, heart failure, and reduced quality of life. While catheter ablation is widely used for rhythm control, its efficacy is limited in persistent and long-standing atrial fibrillation. Over the past two decades, minimally invasive surgical strategies have emerged as effective alternatives, aiming to replicate the success of the Cox-Maze procedure while reducing surgical trauma. This overview critically summarizes the current minimally invasive techniques available for atrial fibrillation treatment, including mini-thoracotomy ablation, thoracoscopic ablation, and hybrid procedures such as the convergent approach. These methods offer the potential for durable sinus rhythm restoration by enabling direct visualization, transmural lesion creation, and left atrial appendage exclusion, with lower perioperative morbidity compared to traditional open surgery. The choice of energy source plays a key role in lesion efficacy and safety. Particular attention is given to the technical steps of each procedure, patient selection criteria, and the role of left atrial appendage closure in stroke prevention. Hybrid strategies, which combine epicardial surgical ablation with endocardial catheter-based procedures, have shown encouraging outcomes in patients with refractory or long-standing atrial fibrillation. Despite the steep learning curve, minimally invasive techniques provide significant benefits in terms of recovery time, reduced hospital stay, and fewer complications. As evidence continues to evolve, these approaches represent a key advancement in the surgical management of atrial fibrillation, deserving integration into contemporary treatment algorithms and multidisciplinary heart team planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.