ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2025
Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Unveiled: Pathophysiology, Imaging, and Evolving Management Strategies.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Decision-Making and Imaging-Guided Follow-Up Strategies in Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Severe Factor XII Deficiency in a Patient with Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an increasingly recognized, non-atherosclerotic cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), particularly in younger women. This comprehensive review outlines SCAD's unique pathophysiology, which is linked to underlying arteriopathies like fibromuscular dysplasia, and highlights the critical role of advanced intravascular imaging for accurate diagnosis. A fundamental shift in management is detailed, with evidence favoring a conservative strategy for stable patients due to high rates of spontaneous vessel healing, reserving technically challenging invasive interventions for high-risk cases. Importantly, this review also addresses long-term outcomes, noting significant rates of recurrence and Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE), a high prevalence of persistent chest pain, and the central role of beta-blocker therapy in secondary prevention. Ultimately, SCAD requires a departure from standard ACS protocols towards a personalized approach that emphasizes accurate diagnosis, cautious initial management, and vigilant long-term follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.