ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2025
Nonclinical Human Cardiac New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) Predict Vanoxerine-Induced Proarrhythmic Potential.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review of in vitro approaches for assessing the toxicity of chemical stressors across diverse physiological systems.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026Review
- Clinical trials in a dish: cardiometabolic drug development with biological and digital twins.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- Advances in New Approach Methodologies at FDA's Division of Applied Regulatory Science.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Review
- QT Myopia and Cardiac Safety: Expanding the Aperture of Arrhythmia Assessment in Early Phase Drug Development.Clinical and translational science · 2026Review
- Reassessing the Conduct of Patch Clamp Cardiac Ion Channel Assays to Improve Nonclinical Data Translation to Clinical ECG Changes and Proarrythmia Risk.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
New approach methodologies (NAMs), including microphysiological systems (MPSs), can recapitulate structural and functional complexities of organs. Vanoxerine was reported to induce cardiac adverse events, including torsade de points (TdP), in a Phase III clinical trial. Despite earlier nonclinical animal models and Phase I-II clinical trials, events of QT prolongation or proarrhythmia were not observed. Here, we utilized cardiac NAMs to evaluate the functional consequences of vanoxerine treatment on human cardiac excitation-contraction coupling. The cardiac MPS used in this study was a microfabricated fluidic culture platform with human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) capable of evaluating voltage, intracellular calcium handling, and contractility. Likewise, the hiPSC-CM comprehensive in vitro proarrhythmia assay (CiPA) was employed based on multielectrode array (MEA). Vanoxerine treatment delayed repolarization in a concentration-dependent manner and induced proarrhythmic events in both NAM platforms. The complex cardiac MPS displayed a frequency-dependent vanoxerine response such that EADs were eliminated at a faster pacing rate (1.5 Hz). Moreover, exposure analysis revealed a 99% vanoxerine loss in the cardiac MPS. TdP risk analysis demonstrated high to intermediate TdP risk at clinically relevant concentrations of vanoxerine and frequency-independent EAD events in the hiPSC-CM CiPA model. These findings demonstrate that nonclinical cardiac NAMs can recapitulate clinical outcomes, including detection of vanoxerine-induced delayed repolarization and proarrhythmic effects. Moreover, this work provides a foundation to evaluate the safety and efficacy of novel compounds to reduce the dependence on animal studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.